Tetration Forum
Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp - Printable Version

+- Tetration Forum (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum)
+-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp (/showthread.php?tid=175)

Pages: 1 2 3


RE: Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp - JmsNxn - 04/14/2011

I think the easiest proof is



which can only be true for a constant function.


RE: Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp - bo198214 - 04/15/2011

(04/14/2011, 11:16 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: I think the easiest proof is



which can only be true for a constant function.

But this would need a bit more explanation *why* constancy follows from that. And then its not that short anymore Wink