Poll: do you think this thread is important ?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
yes
33.33%
1 33.33%
no
33.33%
1 33.33%
maybe
33.33%
1 33.33%
Total 3 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

meromorphic idea
#1
i was thinking about tetration and came up with important questions.

for the 3rd time !!

are there meromorphic functions f(x) so that they commute with exp(x) ?

thus :

exp(f(x)) = f(exp(x))


related 2nd question :

t ( t(x) ) = exp(x) ( any real analytic t(x) )

g(x) a meromorphic function


t(x) = inverse_g( 1-fixpoint-regular-half-iterate[ exp(g(x)) ] )


related 3rd question :

q(x) a meromorphic function

t ( t(x) ) = exp(x) ( any real analytic t(x) )

1-fixpoint-regular-half-iterate[ exp(q(x)) ] = t( q(x) )



thanks in advance

regards

tommy1729
#2
(05/13/2009, 04:52 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: are there meromorphic functions f(x) so that they commute with exp(x) ?

I'm not sure if this is important, but I think what is important is whether or not:

"For all f(x) that satisfy \( f(\exp(x)) = \exp(f(x)) \), there exists a unique real number t such that \( f(x) = \exp^t(x) \)."

I'm not convinced that this is always true for holomorphic/meromorphic functions. I'm sure its false for for arbitrary (or piecewise-defined) functions. I also think this would be useful in characterizing fractional iterates.

Andrew Robbins
#3
andydude wrote :

(05/13/2009, 09:51 PM)andydude Wrote:
(05/13/2009, 04:52 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: are there meromorphic functions f(x) so that they commute with exp(x) ?

I'm not sure if this is important, but I think what is important is whether or not:

"For all f(x) that satisfy \( f(\exp(x)) = \exp(f(x)) \), there exists a unique real number t such that \( f(x) = \exp^t(x) \)."

I'm not convinced that this is always true for holomorphic/meromorphic functions. I'm sure its false for for arbitrary (or piecewise-defined) functions. I also think this would be useful in characterizing fractional iterates.

Andrew Robbins

i kinda asked this question before - more or less -

see thread :

http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...hp?tid=270

yes , this is useful in characterizing fractional iterates.

and i believe it is important for some half-iterate questions , though i cant prove it to be for tetration , but im working on it.


regards

tommy1729


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Reviving an old idea with 2sinh. tommy1729 7 2,642 06/28/2022, 02:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  tommy's new conjecture/theorem/idea (2022) ?? tommy1729 0 807 06/22/2022, 11:49 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Revitalizing an old idea : estimated fake sexp'(x) = F3(x) tommy1729 0 1,041 02/27/2022, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  An intuitive idea log*^[n](F(exp*^[n](z0))) tommy1729 0 1,544 03/03/2021, 12:57 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  (draft) integral idea tommy1729 0 4,911 06/25/2011, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  simple idea ... tommy1729 4 11,304 04/29/2009, 05:38 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  a vague idea for f(f(x)) = exp(x) tommy1729 0 4,220 03/17/2009, 11:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Uniqueness summary and idea bo198214 13 33,170 08/16/2007, 10:30 PM
Last Post: jaydfox



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)