Poll: what superfunction terms?
This poll is closed.
super-f, infra-f
0%
0 0%
super-f, Abel-f
0%
0 0%
super-f, arcsuper-f
0%
0 0%
super-f, antisuper-f
0%
0 0%
super-f, sub-f
0%
0 0%
iter-f, Abel-f
25.00%
1 25.00%
iter-f, itra-f
0%
0 0%
ultra-f, infra-f
0%
0 0%
f-exponential, f-logarithm
75.00%
3 75.00%
meta-f, para-f
0%
0 0%
Total 4 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Poll: revised super terminology poll
#1
in response to complaint(s) of bias, i removed the previous poll.
The difference is that anti-iter f is not replaced by itra f.
Pick the one that you think is the best. If you don't care about this issue, PLEASE don't vote - it isn't like a public policy issue, so please don't muddle the opinions of those to whom it matters the most.
Reply
#2
I will leave the polls up for two weeks a week a day a minute. After that I will just by fiat declare the majority to be the "right" terms... heh heh heh, the irony of democracy...
Reply
#3
BE IT RESOLVED, that the function of x, f^r(x), the f-power; its inverse the f-root; the function of r, f^r(x) the f-exponential; its inverse the f-logarithm.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the “hyper-operations” be called the way described in the second (2nd) post of the thread "Poll: hyper-operations terminology" in Tetration Forum.

SIGNED, (sign by posting a signature thread)


Screw all that formalism, just call them f-exponential, f-logarithm, and the superexponentail be called the tetra-exponential, etc.
Reply
#4
But I think to relativize one should also mention that there are only 4 participants in this poll!
Reply
#5
No one seemed to care, that's why I just pretended to declare the right terminology, to see if anyone missed his chance and really wants it.
Reply
#6
Urhh...someone would care... and he is me...
Reply
#7
(08/20/2009, 12:04 PM)bo198214 Wrote: But I think to relativize one should also mention that there are only 4 participants in this poll!

i have to remark : at least 5.

to get to the point :

can you plz explain to me , WHY i cant vote ?

i tried 3 times.

i did not complaints about the forum in the past , but voting is not allowed for me ?

tommy1729
Reply
#8
What exactly doesnt work?
Were you logged in?
Reply
#9
(08/23/2009, 09:50 AM)bo198214 Wrote: What exactly doesnt work?
Were you logged in?

of course i was logged in.

only members can vote.

some members that is ...
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is bugs or features for fatou.gp super-logarithm? Ember Edison 10 487 08/07/2019, 02:44 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition JmsNxn 4 5,889 06/23/2019, 08:19 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 898 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Are there any reputable sources verifying terminology? Chenjesu 0 642 08/09/2018, 08:20 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Inverse super-composition Xorter 11 10,841 05/26/2018, 12:00 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  The super 0th root and a new rule of tetration? Xorter 4 3,035 11/29/2017, 11:53 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  Solving tetration using differintegrals and super-roots JmsNxn 0 1,624 08/22/2016, 10:07 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The super of exp(z)(z^2 + 1) + z. tommy1729 1 2,210 03/15/2016, 01:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Super-root 3 andydude 10 9,326 01/19/2016, 03:14 AM
Last Post: andydude
  super of exp + 2pi i ? tommy1729 1 3,036 08/18/2013, 09:20 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)