Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ?
#1
Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ?

Is that a uniqueness condition ?

The difference between univalent and pseudounivalent is :

speudounivalent is weaker : f(z+k) = f(z) only possible if k is real.

regards

tommy1729
Reply
#2
I have to add : psuedounivalent must be a uniqueness criterion but without existance proven.

This follows from the earlier proven fact that sexp(z) analytic for Re(z)>0 is already a uniqueness criterion.

Hence the question becomes : is this analytic function sexp(z) pseudounivalent ?

We know that sexp(z) has singularies. In the thread " the fermat superfunction " I noticed that most entire functions are not pseudounivalent. The follows from the nonbijective nature of most entire functions and the many amount of fixpoints/zero's of most entire functions.

This motivated me to wonder about functions that are not entire hence returning to sexp(z).

Naturally I also wonder about other superfunctions ofcourse.

I do not recall the exact location of all previous posts regarding these issues but on MSE mick made a related post.


The case which mick answer is actually about exp, but the same applies by analogue to sexp for Re(z)>0.

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/...-equations

Btw his score of -5 is rediculous.
This reminds me of the reasons why I am not or no longer on places such as MSE , sci.math, wiki etc.

Tetration forum rules Smile
But other tend not too imho.

regards

tommy1729
Reply
#3
Let a,b > 0. Let a',b' > 0.
Because exponential iterations of a + b i usually get arbitrarily close to any other a' + b' i , I am tempted to say that sexp(z) is NOT psuedounivalent.

So entire superfunctions are usually not pseudounivalent and since many iterations of analytic functions behave chaotic (like exp) , neither are most nonentire superfunctions.

So, what is an example of a nontrivial pseudounivalent superfunction ?

If they exist at all ?

Together with my friend mick im working on this.

Im pessimistic though.
And you ?

regards

tommy1729
Reply
#4
Related : http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...39#pid6839

SO probably no twice a superfunction.

regards

tommy1729
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 1,375 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can sexp(z) be periodic ?? tommy1729 2 3,485 01/14/2015, 01:19 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  pseudo2periodic sexp. tommy1729 0 1,647 06/27/2014, 10:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? tommy1729 1 2,566 06/17/2014, 01:25 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Multiple exp^[1/2](z) by same sexp ? tommy1729 12 12,526 05/06/2014, 10:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  entire function close to sexp ?? tommy1729 8 8,582 04/30/2014, 03:49 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Vincent's theorem and sin(sexp) ? tommy1729 0 1,580 03/22/2014, 11:46 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  sexp for base (1/e)^e ~= 0.0660? sheldonison 10 9,903 11/22/2013, 11:20 PM
Last Post: mike3
  tetration base conversion, and sexp/slog limit equations sheldonison 44 50,417 02/27/2013, 07:05 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  sexp by continuum product ? tommy1729 6 8,031 06/30/2011, 10:07 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)