• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Understanding Abel/Schroeder with matrix-expression Gottfried Ultimate Fellow Posts: 758 Threads: 117 Joined: Aug 2007 05/26/2008, 07:02 PM (This post was last modified: 05/26/2008, 07:06 PM by Gottfried.) Here I'm considering fractional heights h for the function Ut°h(x) of complex base t, which implemets x -> t^x -1 and hope to get to the source of the persisting problem. Note, that with the previously described method everything is fine with integral heights, so the problem should be somehow systematic. Remember the Schröder-function, whose powerseries-coefficients I find in the 2'nd column of the eigenvectormatrix of the operator Ut, such that $\hspace{24} U_t = W * ^dV(u) * WI$ where u=log(t) and WI is the inverse of W. Then the Schröder-function sigma for parameter t is $\hspace{24} \sigma_t(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} W_{k,1}*x^k$ and the inverse takes the coefficients of WI instead: $\hspace{24} \sigma_t^{-1}(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} WI_{k,1}*x^k$ To compute Ut°1(x) we simply do $\hspace{24} U_t^{{^o}1}(x) = \sigma_t^{-1}(u*\sigma_t(x))$ or, for integer h $\hspace{24} U_t^{{^o}h}(x) = \sigma_t^{-1}(u^h*\sigma_t(x))$ As I said, this works fine even for complex t, checked with some t where abs(t)<1, if heights are integral. But we'll see, that for fractional h this does not work. With this simple process, for instance t=1/2 + 1/2 I there is also no severe problem with convergence or even divergence - things sum up in a completely easy manner - but anyway, the fractional h in u^h produce obviously complete crap. Currently I suspect, that there must be some conjugacy be involved - but don't have a working idea, where. Gottfried Helms, Kassel « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread Understanding Abel/Schroeder with matrix-expression - by Gottfried - 03/30/2008, 05:06 AM more Brainstorming on Abel/Schroeder - by Gottfried - 05/18/2008, 02:36 PM RE: more Brainstorming on Abel/Schroeder - by bo198214 - 05/18/2008, 04:51 PM RE: more Brainstorming on Abel/Schroeder - by Gottfried - 05/18/2008, 07:41 PM RE: more Brainstorming on Abel/Schroeder - by bo198214 - 05/18/2008, 08:00 PM RE: Understanding Schröder with matrix-expression - by Gottfried - 05/19/2008, 12:02 PM RE: Understanding Schröder with matrix-expression - by bo198214 - 05/19/2008, 06:14 PM RE: Understanding Schröder with matrix-expression - by Gottfried - 05/19/2008, 07:45 PM RE: Understanding Schröder with matrix-expression - by Gottfried - 05/19/2008, 07:31 PM RE: Understanding Schroeder with matrix-expression - by Gottfried - 05/20/2008, 10:59 AM RE: Understanding Abel/Schroeder with matrix-expression - by Gottfried - 05/26/2008, 07:02 PM RE: Understanding Abel/Schroeder with matrix-expression - by bo198214 - 05/26/2008, 07:36 PM RE: Understanding Abel/Schroeder with matrix-expression - by Gottfried - 05/26/2008, 08:45 PM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Moving between Abel's and Schroeder's Functional Equations Daniel 1 113 01/16/2020, 10:08 PM Last Post: sheldonison The Tao of Abel and Schroeder Daniel 0 83 12/24/2019, 11:25 AM Last Post: Daniel Tommy's matrix method for superlogarithm. tommy1729 0 1,679 05/07/2016, 12:28 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [split] Understanding Kneser Riemann method andydude 7 8,018 01/13/2016, 10:58 PM Last Post: sheldonison [2015] New zeration and matrix log ? tommy1729 1 3,194 03/24/2015, 07:07 AM Last Post: marraco Regular iteration using matrix-Jordan-form Gottfried 7 8,662 09/29/2014, 11:39 PM Last Post: Gottfried Is this entire expression for tetration legal JmsNxn 4 4,706 01/20/2013, 07:32 PM Last Post: cosurgi Q: Exponentiation of a carleman-matrix Gottfried 0 2,875 11/19/2012, 10:18 AM Last Post: Gottfried Is the following expression for tetration useful? JmsNxn 9 9,065 11/14/2012, 11:29 PM Last Post: tommy1729 A support for Andy's (P.Walker's) slog-matrix-method Gottfried 0 2,435 11/14/2011, 04:01 AM Last Post: Gottfried

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)