• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Laws and Orders bo198214 Administrator Posts: 1,389 Threads: 90 Joined: Aug 2007 04/27/2008, 10:56 AM (This post was last modified: 04/27/2008, 11:00 AM by bo198214.) GFR Wrote:Concerning the DL, I prefer my "implication", i.e.: IF a[s]x = x, THEN x = a[s+1]oo Gianfranco, that is not true! Take $a=\sqrt{2}$ and $x=4$ then surely $a[3]x=x$. But $4\neq 2 = a[4]\infty$. You can not bend mathematics to suit your wishes. « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/23/2008, 09:17 AM RE: Laws and Orders - by andydude - 04/23/2008, 11:44 AM RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 04/24/2008, 06:39 AM RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/24/2008, 09:38 AM RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 04/24/2008, 06:24 PM RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/25/2008, 04:40 PM RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 04/25/2008, 08:24 PM RE: Laws and Orders - by bo198214 - 04/26/2008, 10:43 PM RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/27/2008, 12:50 AM RE: Laws and Orders - by bo198214 - 04/27/2008, 10:56 AM RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/27/2008, 10:18 PM RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 05/02/2008, 09:47 PM RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 05/20/2008, 07:08 PM RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 05/25/2008, 03:10 PM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 2 957 09/09/2019, 10:38 PM Last Post: tommy1729

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)