Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Universal uniqueness criterion?
#43
(06/22/2009, 09:46 PM)bo198214 Wrote: I asked you som time ago to apply your algorithm to other fixed points, but you somehow did not follow that path.
Assume that for another tetration , we have some probe function for real ; id est, along the imaginary axis.
Assume, Function is suposed to go to at infinity and at minus infinity; , and is integer constant.
In order to adjust the probe function to some tetration, we need to evaluate the contour integral. If we use the same contour as in the paper http://www.ams.org/mcom/2009-78-267/S002.../home.html
then we need the values at and for real .
It is easy to estimate values at ; use estimate .
As for ; we use estimate for positive and for negative . Either we have singularity (jump) at , or .

This explains, why I did not construct such "another tetration", but this is not a proof that this is impossible. Suggest the holomorphic probe function to begin with. Such a function should have some smooth kink of the phase, in order to avoid the jump;
but allow such a jump for the principal branch of its logarithm.
Then we can run the same algorithm, with additional control of the branch of the logarithm. Such a control should recover ,
adding unity or minus unity to each time when passes through negative real values. We need the holomorphic kinky probe function, then we can run the algorithm to recover the kinky tetration.
I think about something like
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Universal uniqueness criterion? - by bo198214 - 05/21/2008, 06:24 PM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by andydude - 05/22/2008, 05:19 AM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by andydude - 05/22/2008, 06:42 AM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by bo198214 - 05/22/2008, 11:25 AM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by andydude - 05/22/2008, 03:11 PM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by bo198214 - 05/22/2008, 05:55 PM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by bo198214 - 05/23/2008, 12:07 PM
Uniqueness of analytic tetration - by Kouznetsov - 09/30/2008, 07:58 AM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by bo198214 - 10/04/2008, 11:19 PM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by bo198214 - 06/19/2009, 02:51 PM
RE: miner error found in paper - by bo198214 - 06/19/2009, 04:53 PM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by bo198214 - 06/19/2009, 06:25 PM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by bo198214 - 06/19/2009, 07:59 PM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by bo198214 - 06/20/2009, 02:10 PM
RE: Universal uniqueness criterion? - by bo198214 - 07/05/2009, 06:54 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Semi-exp and the geometric derivative. A criterion. tommy1729 0 1,103 09/19/2017, 09:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  A conjectured uniqueness criteria for analytic tetration Vladimir Reshetnikov 13 9,793 02/17/2017, 05:21 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Uniqueness of half-iterate of exp(x) ? tommy1729 14 13,273 01/09/2017, 02:41 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Removing the branch points in the base: a uniqueness condition? fivexthethird 0 1,361 03/19/2016, 10:44 AM
Last Post: fivexthethird
  [2014] Uniqueness of periodic superfunction tommy1729 0 1,738 11/09/2014, 10:20 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Real-analytic tetration uniqueness criterion? mike3 25 19,225 06/15/2014, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  exp^[1/2](x) uniqueness from 2sinh ? tommy1729 1 2,012 06/03/2014, 09:58 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Uniqueness Criterion for Tetration jaydfox 9 10,401 05/01/2014, 10:21 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Uniqueness of Ansus' extended sum superfunction bo198214 4 6,190 10/25/2013, 11:27 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  A question concerning uniqueness JmsNxn 3 5,136 10/06/2011, 04:32 AM
Last Post: sheldonison



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)