Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Weak theorem about an almost identical function: PROOF
Hello. This topic is related to
In that branch, I explained why the lemma (when we prove it) about "alomost identical finction" leads to the uniqueness of the holomorphic tetration,
assuming, that tetration has no singularities at .
"almost udentical" means, that function is 1-periodic and "small enough" so that

Here, I present the weak version of that theorem. This weak version can be used to prove the uniqueness of tetration, assuming that this tetration is holomorphic outside the real axis. It can be applied to the case of base , considered in ;
in this case, all the singulatities of tetration are at the real axis.

My today's proof does not match exactly all the criteria suggested in
(that range allows tetration to have singulatities at ).
To avoid confusions, I open the new branch for this.
I call it "weak theorem", because it cannot be applied as is to the tetation at base
, reserving the name "strong theorem" for the more general case that will work for all .

I begin with so long introduction in order to make this piece readable without background about previous posts.

Weak theorem about almost identical functions.


is entire 1-periodic function


Vulgarization: if function is somehow "small", then, function
looks as "almost identical". The almost identical function must have negative integer values in some points outside the real axis.


Hypothesis 0: For each integer ,
there exists only one .

Below, I make some deduction based on Hypothesis 0 and show that this hypothesis is not consistent with Theorem 0.

From Hypothesis (0) it follows that
is entire function of .

Theredore is also entire function.

Function grows up to infinity along some contours at
. Let contour provides the fastest growth, id est, realizes the maximal

While , the combined function should approach :

The limit is not allowed to exist because
would be singularity of function .
Hence, grows to infinity.
Hence, should have asymptotically linear growth at infinity.

Among entire functions, the only polynomials are allowed to have polynomial growth at infinity; all other entire funcitons grow faster. Hence, is linear function.

Then, is rational function.
This property contradicts the conditions of the Theorem, because is non-trivial periodic function.

In such a qay, Hypothesis 0 contradicts conditions of the Theorem.
Hence, there exist more than one point such that .
Due to the monotonous growth of function [math]J[/math] along the real axis, such a point is outside of the real axis.

(end of proof).

The theorem above provides the uniqueness of tetration at least for base
; in this case, all the singulatities of tetration are along the real axis. It colleagues agree with the proof of the theorem abovr, we can copypast here the condinuation, id est, the proof of uniqueness of tetration for this case.

P.S. Although Henryk suggests word "superexponentiation" instead of "tetration", I keep here "tetration" because I hope to make also unique holomorphic pentation in the similar way; in the case of superexponentiation, the pentation would have to be called supersuperexponentiation which is too long.

Messages In This Thread
Weak theorem about an almost identical function: PROOF - by Kouznetsov - 11/14/2008, 01:20 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New mathematical object - hyperanalytic function arybnikov 4 1,034 01/02/2020, 01:38 AM
Last Post: arybnikov
  Is there a function space for tetration? Chenjesu 0 661 06/23/2019, 08:24 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Where is the proof of a generalized integral for integer heights? Chenjesu 2 1,370 03/03/2019, 08:55 AM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Degamma function Xorter 0 1,122 10/22/2018, 11:29 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  (almost) proof of TPID 13 fivexthethird 1 2,592 05/06/2016, 04:12 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Should tetration be a multivalued function? marraco 17 18,578 01/14/2016, 04:24 AM
Last Post: marraco
  Introducing new special function : Lambert_t(z,r) tommy1729 2 3,998 01/10/2016, 06:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
Sad Tommy-Mandelbrot function tommy1729 0 2,175 04/21/2015, 01:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Theorem in fractional calculus needed for hyperoperators JmsNxn 5 7,092 07/07/2014, 06:47 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? tommy1729 1 3,096 06/17/2014, 01:25 PM
Last Post: sheldonison

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)