(06/11/2009, 06:26 PM)Gottfried Wrote: Don't know yet, whether this has some benefit so far.
It looks, as if we had a discussion of that recently in Upper superexponential
I'm excerpting a bit of Henryk's post:
(03/29/2009, 11:23 AM)bo198214 Wrote: As it is well-known we have forthe regular superexponential at the lower fixed point.
This can be obtained by computing the Schroeder function at the fixed pointof
.
(...)
Now the upper regular superexponentialis the one obtained at the upper fixed point of
.
For this function we have however always, so the condition
can not be met.
Instead we normalize it by, which gives the formula:
(*1)![]()
(...)
My construction in the previous post was obviously the same as that above construction (*1) ... Gottfried (I added the comments //... )
Gottfried Wrote:Then we can write
and the k'th coefficient in my first mail is just 2* C^k * d_k in the formula above.
where the fixpoint "a" is simply given as constant 2 and could be generalized to the symbol. The sum-expression describes the inverse of the schröder-function chi^-1 in Henryk's post. The formula for the repelling fixpoint replaces simply 2 by 4 and (1/2-1) by (5/4-1) and uses the adapted schröder-function. So I think it's useful to redirect replies to the other thread...
Gottfried Helms, Kassel