Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Status of proofs
#1
Henryk brings up the issue of proofs being needed for extending the definition of tetration to the real numbers. I am interested to hear what people consider needs to be proven to establish tetration for real and complex numbers. A number of people have asserted that they have extended tetration. I worry that this is a race without a commonly accepted finish line.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Status of proofs - by Daniel - 08/24/2007, 06:56 PM
RE: Status of proofs - by bo198214 - 08/24/2007, 07:16 PM
RE: Status of proofs - by bo198214 - 08/24/2007, 07:23 PM
RE: Status of proofs - by Daniel - 08/24/2007, 11:09 PM
RE: Status of proofs - by bo198214 - 08/25/2007, 12:07 AM
RE: Status of proofs - by bo198214 - 08/27/2007, 08:54 AM
RE: Status of proofs - by Gottfried - 08/24/2007, 10:06 PM
RE: Status of proofs - by Daniel - 08/24/2007, 11:02 PM
RE: Status of proofs - by Gottfried - 08/29/2007, 06:07 AM
RE: Status of proofs - by andydude - 08/29/2007, 05:04 AM
RE: Status of proofs - by tommy1729 - 07/20/2010, 10:02 PM
RE: Status of proofs - by bo198214 - 07/21/2010, 03:08 AM
RE: Status of proofs - by tommy1729 - 07/21/2010, 10:39 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)