Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition
#5
Shouldn't this follow directly from the fact that addition is axiomatic? If such a hyperoperation existed below addition, then you'd be contradicting the existence of the axioms upon which you've constructed addition in the first place to even define real numbers.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition - by Chenjesu - 06/23/2019, 08:19 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is bugs or features for fatou.gp super-logarithm? Ember Edison 10 442 08/07/2019, 02:44 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 878 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Tetration and Sign operator tetration101 0 158 05/15/2019, 07:55 PM
Last Post: tetration101
  Inverse super-composition Xorter 11 10,820 05/26/2018, 12:00 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  The super 0th root and a new rule of tetration? Xorter 4 3,024 11/29/2017, 11:53 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  Solving tetration using differintegrals and super-roots JmsNxn 0 1,616 08/22/2016, 10:07 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Between addition and product ( pic ) tommy1729 4 3,134 07/10/2016, 07:32 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Fundamental Principles of Tetration Daniel 13 10,856 03/16/2016, 09:40 PM
Last Post: Daniel
  The super of exp(z)(z^2 + 1) + z. tommy1729 1 2,206 03/15/2016, 01:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Super-root 3 andydude 10 9,300 01/19/2016, 03:14 AM
Last Post: andydude



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)