Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Number theoretic formula for hyper operators (-oo, 2] at prime numbers
#1
It took some thinking but I recovered a closed form expression for hyper operators at prime numbers. The result is interesting to say the least. It is not analytic; and in fact the iteration may not even be continuous but discrete. We start by considering a function

















But the fundamental theorem of arithmetic applies for as well.



Iterating we get a formula:



This allows us to develop an expression for integer arguments of . We will now make some claims about the structure of iterating .

Claim I:

is one to one for all complex iterates that exist and satisfy . This qualifies as the reason operators in between are not commutative. The reason isn't one to one is because it turns . However; since we have because is not commutative.

Claim II:
's range is closed under multiplication

Claim III:
for some sequence . This claim implies II with some algebra, but as well determines some more powerful results. This factorization into primes with algebraic exponents is unique by Baker's theorem. This would be the main restriction determining for what values of we can iterate .

With these we define hyper operators by the following formula.





And we extend the operators recursively to the negative domain by the following law, and



These operators form the tremendous result, for of forming a commutative semi-ring! But on top of that: Recursion is satisfied for all prime numbers.




The question is, of course, how do we define iteration on . And on top of that, where and when is an iterate defined?

These operators have some really interesting results involving unique factorization. Although, all these further results rely on iterating with the restriction of claims I-III. So I'm wondering if anyone knows of any techniques that would be required? I'm thinking the iteration would require not a continuous expression but a discrete expression involving the unique coefficients of .

This can work in fact for every natural number given a few tweaks that I'll explain later.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Number theoretic formula for hyper operators (-oo, 2] at prime numbers - by JmsNxn - 06/04/2012, 08:05 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 2 271 09/09/2019, 10:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Hyper-volume by integration Xorter 0 1,275 04/08/2017, 01:52 PM
Last Post: Xorter
  Hyper operators in computability theory JmsNxn 5 3,620 02/15/2017, 10:07 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Recursive formula generating bounded hyper-operators JmsNxn 0 1,392 01/17/2017, 05:10 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Extrapolated Faá Di Bruno's Formula Xorter 1 1,948 11/19/2016, 02:37 PM
Last Post: Xorter
  Rational operators (a {t} b); a,b > e solved JmsNxn 30 36,231 09/02/2016, 02:11 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators JmsNxn 15 15,575 08/22/2016, 12:19 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Cellular auto : rule 30 number ? tommy1729 0 1,203 08/03/2016, 08:31 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  The bounded analytic semiHyper-operators JmsNxn 2 3,364 05/27/2016, 04:03 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Spiral Numbers tommy1729 9 7,583 03/01/2016, 10:15 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)