• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators JmsNxn Long Time Fellow Posts: 291 Threads: 67 Joined: Dec 2010 08/08/2012, 11:23 AM (This post was last modified: 08/11/2012, 12:46 AM by JmsNxn.) Let's start by restricting ourselves to the following set: $\mathbb{L}_{x,s} = \{\ell | \,\,x\,\,\bigtriangleup_s\,\,\ell\,\,\in \,\,\mathbb{N}\}$ We find that these numbers can be sequenced by $\ell_c$ such that $\ell_c < \ell_{c+1}$ Our required theorem is the following: $x\,\,\bigtriangleup_{s-1}\,\,(x\,\,\bigtriangleup_s\,\,\ell_c) = x \,\,\bigtriangleup_s\,\,(\ell_c + 1)$ I'll rephrase this algebraically as: $\circ: \mathbb{C} \times \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{C}$ $\circ$ is non-commutative and non-associative $s \in \mathbb{C}$ $s \circ \ell_c \in \mathbb{N}$ $(s-1) \circ (s \circ \ell_c) = s \circ (\ell_c+1)$ I'm keeping this as a foot note. It may be beneficial to consider operators as such. It seems far less gargantuan and much more as an algebraic equation. Another formula I'm thinking I'll have to make use of is: $\forall m\forall x \forall y \,\,m,x,y \in \mathbb{N}\,\,;\,\,m \ge x+y\,\,x,y>1\,\,(x \vee y) > 2$ $\exists \sigma\,\,\sigma \in \mathbb{R}$ $x\,\,\bigtriangleup_\sigma\,\,y = m$ It's sort of like a quick fundamental theorem of arithmetic. I think it encodes more data then it's letting on. Although this seems a bit trivial now. But with the inverse operator function; the inverse of: $\Pi(s) = x\,\,\bigtriangleup_s\,\,y$ Or at least a discrete point set of when $\phi$ returns a natural number we may be able to have some conversations with number theory. I feel like if this isn't the right answer for semi operators; it's a big leap in the right direction--the analytic direction. I like to think of it aesthetically as every complex operator is a unique factorization of the natural operators. Hopefully this can be sustained with the recursive law and maybe an identity function. I'm hoping to sort of web together the recursion at all the points that are natural; showing from the mere fact of their existence (which requires the two requirements before) rather than computing them. I think it's pretty clear that computing this function to any degree of accuracy would need a quantum computer. Lol. I'm sorry to hear that you're sick. Hope you get well. YES!!!! I have a taylor series! I have recursion written out as a requirement using typical analytic expressions! It's all down to a recursive pattern in $\psi$ I'm very close to obtaining a solution. I have a feeling uniqueness will be the difficult task. From here on however. I don't want to post too much until I have it all organized. I'm going to start writing up a short fifteen page or so paper on these. I'll be sure to give everyone at this forum credit. I've been posting stuff about this for a year and you guys have helped me into the environment tremendously--even just by forcing myself to keep up with you guys ^_^. When I have a rough draft I'll post another thread. I may ask a few questions here and there as well. I'm very confident this is going to be fruitful in some way. « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 07/19/2012, 04:44 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 07/19/2012, 05:49 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by tommy1729 - 07/19/2012, 10:16 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 07/19/2012, 10:26 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by tommy1729 - 07/19/2012, 11:03 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 07/19/2012, 11:20 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 07/20/2012, 09:49 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by tommy1729 - 07/21/2012, 03:42 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 07/24/2012, 07:14 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 08/03/2012, 06:43 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by tommy1729 - 08/06/2012, 03:32 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 08/08/2012, 11:23 AM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by Gottfried - 08/09/2012, 08:59 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 08/10/2012, 10:57 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by Xorter - 08/18/2016, 04:40 PM RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 08/22/2016, 12:19 AM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 2 930 09/09/2019, 10:38 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 4,782 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM Last Post: Ember Edison Where is the proof of a generalized integral for integer heights? Chenjesu 2 1,372 03/03/2019, 08:55 AM Last Post: Chenjesu Hyper-volume by integration Xorter 0 1,600 04/08/2017, 01:52 PM Last Post: Xorter Hyper operators in computability theory JmsNxn 5 4,727 02/15/2017, 10:07 PM Last Post: MphLee Recursive formula generating bounded hyper-operators JmsNxn 0 1,719 01/17/2017, 05:10 AM Last Post: JmsNxn Rational operators (a {t} b); a,b > e solved JmsNxn 30 42,951 09/02/2016, 02:11 AM Last Post: tommy1729 The bounded analytic semiHyper-operators JmsNxn 2 3,972 05/27/2016, 04:03 AM Last Post: JmsNxn on constructing hyper operations for bases > eta JmsNxn 1 3,015 04/08/2015, 09:18 PM Last Post: marraco Bounded Analytic Hyper operators JmsNxn 25 22,458 04/01/2015, 06:09 PM Last Post: MphLee

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)