Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
On replacing 2sinh(2 x) with F(x) ...
#3
I came to realise that I am close to a proof that any formula of the form lim n-> oo ln^[n](f^[x](exp^[n])) for f^[1] entire , cannot be analytic. For certain the probability is at most 1/R where R is the cardinality of the continuum.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: On replacing 2sinh(2 x) with F(x) ... - by tommy1729 - 02/21/2013, 11:37 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  tommy's simple solution ln^[n](2sinh^[n+x](z)) tommy1729 1 2,272 01/17/2017, 07:21 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  2sinh^[r](z) = 0 ?? tommy1729 0 1,237 02/23/2016, 11:13 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2014] Representations by 2sinh^[0.5] tommy1729 1 2,196 11/16/2014, 07:40 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  fake id(x) for better 2sinh method. tommy1729 5 4,508 06/05/2014, 08:21 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  exp^[1/2](x) uniqueness from 2sinh ? tommy1729 1 2,081 06/03/2014, 09:58 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Is the half iterate of 2sinh(x) analytic near R ? tommy1729 1 2,350 03/13/2013, 12:13 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Another asymptotic development, similar to 2sinh method JmsNxn 0 2,401 07/05/2011, 06:34 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)