Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A new set of numbers is necessary to extend tetration to real exponents.
#8
(03/19/2015, 09:59 PM)sheldonison Wrote:
(03/19/2015, 12:47 AM)marraco Wrote: ....
Tetration exponent product is non commutative. In general:


I would also add that for analytic tetration in general:

I defined

as ttr( ,n,1)=a

were may be multivalued.

It has some problems, like , which has "a" solutions, (for a E N), against °a=1 by definition.

So, it looks like this definition of is wrong all the way.

Still, there should be some, non integer number t, such


Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A new set of numbers is necessary to extend tetration to real exponents. - by marraco - 03/19/2015, 10:45 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Minimum axioms to extend tetration Daniel 0 157 07/21/2019, 11:38 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  b^b^x with base 0<b<e^-e have three real fixpoints Gottfried 1 2,012 11/07/2017, 11:06 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Spiral Numbers tommy1729 9 7,395 03/01/2016, 10:15 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Fractionally dimensioned numbers marraco 3 3,291 03/01/2016, 09:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  2 real fixpoints again ....... tommy1729 10 8,167 02/23/2016, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Tommy's conjecture : every positive integer is the sum of at most 8 pentatope numbers tommy1729 0 1,967 08/17/2014, 09:01 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Real-analytic tetration uniqueness criterion? mike3 25 19,384 06/15/2014, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  About real limits tommy1729 1 2,208 09/23/2013, 09:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Number theoretic formula for hyper operators (-oo, 2] at prime numbers JmsNxn 2 3,738 07/17/2012, 02:12 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  A notation for really big numbers Tai Ferret 4 6,865 02/14/2012, 10:48 PM
Last Post: Tai Ferret



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)