Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Taylor polynomial. System of equations for the coefficients.
#12
(05/06/2015, 02:42 PM)marraco Wrote:
(05/05/2015, 07:40 AM)Gottfried Wrote: P*A = A*Bb

I think that we are speaking of different things.

Obviously, there should be a way to demonstrate the equivalence of both, because they are trying to solve the same problem; looking for the same solution.

But as I understand, the Carleman matrix A only contains powers of a_i coefficients, yet if you look at the red side, it cannot be written as a matrix product A*Bb, because it needs to have products of a_i coefficients (like ). Maybe it is a power of A.Bb, or something like A^Bb?

No, no ... In your convolution-formula you have in the inner of the double sum powers of powerseries (the red-colored formula in your first posting ) with the coefficients of the a()-function (not of its single coefficients), and if I decode this correctly, then this matches perfectly the composition of

V(x)*A * Bb = (V(x)*A) * Bb = [1,a(x), a(x)^2, a(x)^3),...] * Bb = V(a(x))*Bb

Only, that after removing of the left V(x)-vector we do things in different order:

V(x)*A * Bb = V(x)*(A * Bb )

and I discuss that remaining matrix in the parenthese of the rhs. That V(x) can be removed on the rhs and on the lhs of the matrix-equation must be justified; if anywhere occur divergent series, this becomes difficult, but as far as we have nonzero intervals of convergence for all dot-products, this exploitation of associativity can be done /should be possible to be done (as far as I think). (The goal of this all is of course to improve computability of A, for instance by diagonalization of P or Bb and algebraic manipulations of the occuring matrix-factors).

Anyway - I hope I didn't actually misread you (which is always possible given the lot of coefficients... )

Gottfried
Gottfried Helms, Kassel
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Taylor polinomial. System of equations for the coefficients. - by Gottfried - 05/06/2015, 04:17 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Question Taylor series of i[x] Xorter 12 10,284 02/20/2018, 09:55 PM
Last Post: Xorter
  Taylor series of cheta Xorter 13 10,967 08/28/2016, 08:52 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Totient equations tommy1729 0 1,608 05/08/2015, 11:20 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Bundle equations for bases > 2 tommy1729 0 1,606 04/18/2015, 12:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Grzegorczyk hierarchy vs Iterated differential equations? MphLee 0 1,899 01/03/2015, 11:02 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  A system of functional equations for slog(x) ? tommy1729 3 4,078 07/28/2014, 09:16 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  partial invariant equations ? tommy1729 0 1,703 03/16/2013, 12:32 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  tetration base conversion, and sexp/slog limit equations sheldonison 44 50,857 02/27/2013, 07:05 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Superfunctions in continu sum equations tommy1729 0 1,865 01/03/2013, 12:02 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can we prove these coefficients must be constant? JmsNxn 0 1,763 06/03/2012, 09:17 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)