Superroots and a generalization for the Lambert-W
#15
(11/24/2015, 02:56 AM)Gottfried Wrote: Did you see already whether it is possibly simply extensible to higher orders?

Gottfried

I tried doing something similar with superroot-4, but no luck, however, I found the coefficients by solving the equation

\( \exp_{\exp(u)}^{3}(z) = \exp(v) \)

so you should be able to add \( z^j \) to the above formula to solve this generalization. The above formula is just the special case when \( z=1 \).


Messages In This Thread
RE: Superroots and a generalization for the Lambert-W - by andydude - 11/24/2015, 07:16 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Nixon-Banach-Lambert-Raes tetration is analytic , simple and “ closed form “ !! tommy1729 11 9,076 02/04/2021, 03:47 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Superroots (formal powerseries) Gottfried 10 28,335 04/05/2011, 03:22 AM
Last Post: Stan
  Infinite towers & solutions to Lambert W-function brangelito 1 7,562 06/16/2010, 02:50 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Lambert W function and the Super Square Root James Knight 3 15,004 10/29/2009, 06:30 AM
Last Post: andydude
  the extent of generalization Matt D 11 26,698 10/15/2007, 04:52 PM
Last Post: Matt D



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)