Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Removing the branch points in the base: a uniqueness condition?
#1
In many cases, when dealing with the math behind tetration, a recurring feature is the logarithm of the fixed point multiplier , which I will call from here on
Since the fixed point multiplier is determined by the base, is really just the base in disguise:

But all three functions have branch points that correspond to the ones in tetration's base: the inner log to 0, the productlog to , the outer log to 1.
Thus, I think that it's reasonable to desire the following to be the case for any reasonable tetration:
Let x > 0 and tet(x,b) be our tetration solution.
Then analytically continues to a function without branch points in
So in other words, the branch we're on should entirely depend on what branches of those three functions we pick.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A conjectured uniqueness criteria for analytic tetration Vladimir Reshetnikov 13 9,915 02/17/2017, 05:21 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Uniqueness of half-iterate of exp(x) ? tommy1729 14 13,433 01/09/2017, 02:41 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Are tetrations fixed points analytic? JmsNxn 2 2,552 12/14/2016, 08:50 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  [2014] Uniqueness of periodic superfunction tommy1729 0 1,760 11/09/2014, 10:20 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Real-analytic tetration uniqueness criterion? mike3 25 19,384 06/15/2014, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  exp^[1/2](x) uniqueness from 2sinh ? tommy1729 1 2,037 06/03/2014, 09:58 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Uniqueness Criterion for Tetration jaydfox 9 10,480 05/01/2014, 10:21 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Uniqueness of Ansus' extended sum superfunction bo198214 4 6,246 10/25/2013, 11:27 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  A question concerning uniqueness JmsNxn 3 5,183 10/06/2011, 04:32 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Principal Branch of the Super-logarithm andydude 7 13,181 06/20/2011, 09:32 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)