Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Interesting value for W, h involving phi,Omega?
#31
Ivars Wrote:I was studying the graph of selfroot of Lambert function:

W(x)^(1/W(x)).

It has maximum value at x=(e*(e^e)) and is e^(1/e) ; so

W(e*(e^e)) =W(e^(e+1))= e


If we use this, we can find :

h( (e^(-(e^e)))^e))= h(1,28785E-1Cool

ln((e^(-(e^e))))^e)= e*ln(e^(-e^e)) = -e*e^e

so :

h( (e^(-(e^e)))^e))= -W(-ln((e^(-(e^e)))^e))/ln((e^(-(e^e)))^e)=

-W(e*e^e)/-e*e^e = -e/-e*e^e = 1/e^e= e^(-e)

So:

h( (e^(-(e^e)))^e))= h(1,28785E-1Cool= e^(-e) = 0,065988036

and second superroot of ((e^(e^e))^e) = ln(((e^(e^e))^e))/W(ln ((e^(e^e))^e)) = e*(e^e)/W(e*(e^e)) = e*(e^e)/e = e^e= 15,15426224

Ssroot( ((e^(e^e))^e)= ssroot(7,76487E+17) = e^e = 15,15426224

For these values, h(1/a) = 1/ssroot(a)

I wonder are there any similar relations for W((1/e)*(e^e)) =W(e^(e-1))= W(5.574..) = 1.3894..


Ivars
Reply
#32
Finally I understood defintion of Omega via e secondsuperroot of e :

Ssroot (e) = ln(e) / W(ln(e)) = 1/Omega

So e= (1/Omega)^(1/Omega)

1/e = (1/Omega)^(-1/Omega) = (Omega)^(1/Omega)

Which was known, of course.

Ivars
Reply
#33
Sorry Henryk I had to add short version here as it belong Interesting things/ Omega thread if someone is looking here for more interesting values....

I constructed the following function (basically using only real part of module of each iterate) to see what happens when its iterated:



Since it is obvious that is the only starting point that will not move since every iteration will return to as argument for and will be next one to converge to after first iteration.

So may play a special role in this iterations, and it does.Firstly, all iterations from 1 to pass via this point .

Then I found 8500 Excel precision iterates in the region x = ]0.001:0.001:2.71[ (for a starter, it can be done for negative /positive x outside this region as well), via formula:




So first conclusion after some numerical modelling and graphing visible in

Limit of mean value of iterations of ln(mod(Re(ln(x))) = -Omega constant

from all this is :



Second, that iterations are bounded with span of values depending on the choice of x steps : size of step and linearity/nonlinearity.

Also:



Also obviously:

for all positive n


for all positive n

Ivars
Reply
#34
We can create the following expression:



Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Limit of mean of Iterations of f(x)=(ln(x);x>0,ln(-x) x<0) =-Omega constant for all x Ivars 10 13,183 03/29/2015, 08:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  regular tetration base sqrt(2) : an interesting(?) constant 2.76432104 Gottfried 7 7,883 06/25/2013, 01:37 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  (MSE): Comparision of powertowers -.Possibly interesting thread in MSE Gottfried 0 1,647 05/22/2013, 07:02 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Continuum sums -- a big problem and some interesting observations mike3 17 17,059 10/12/2010, 10:41 AM
Last Post: Ansus
  Something interesting about Taylor series Ztolk 3 5,863 06/29/2010, 06:32 AM
Last Post: bo198214
  interesting pattern in hyper-operations Base-Acid Tetration 8 10,063 05/04/2009, 09:15 PM
Last Post: BenStandeven
  Infinite tetration giving I*Omega costant=I*0.567143... Ivars 13 12,233 03/09/2008, 01:16 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Observations on power series involving logarithmic singularities jaydfox 29 25,951 11/12/2007, 10:59 AM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)