• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 The super 0th root and a new rule of tetration? Xorter Fellow Posts: 79 Threads: 26 Joined: Aug 2016 11/27/2017, 01:44 PM Hi, everyone! I have been working on the so-called iterated analysis. And I have found an interesting formula in that I am not so sure, so I share it with you to discuss it. So, what if I say: lim h->infinity super 1/h-th root of ( (f^^N)-th root of f^^N ) = lim h->infinity (super 1/h-th root of ((f)-th root of f))^^N which is equivalent to super 0th root of ( (f^^N)-th root of f^^N ) = (super 0th root of ((f)-th root of f))^^N 1st question: How can we calculate the super 0th root of a number or a function? Any idea? Xorter Unizo Xorter Fellow Posts: 79 Threads: 26 Joined: Aug 2016 11/27/2017, 06:33 PM (This post was last modified: 11/28/2017, 01:08 PM by Xorter. Edit Reason: grammar ) Okay, I revised the formula, and I guess my intuation mislead me, maybe. But I have a good news, too. Maybe this formula will bring the trueth: lim h->infinity (log(f(x+1/h)^^N)/log(f(x)^^N))^^h = lim h->infinity ((log(f(x+1/h))/log(f(x)))^^h)^^N Do you think it can be correct? Xorter Unizo sheldonison Long Time Fellow Posts: 574 Threads: 22 Joined: Oct 2008 11/28/2017, 04:15 PM (This post was last modified: 11/28/2017, 09:28 PM by sheldonison.) (11/27/2017, 06:33 PM)Xorter Wrote: Okay, I revised the formula, and I guess my intuation mislead me, maybe. But I have a good news, too. Maybe this formula will bring the trueth: lim h->infinity (log(f(x+1/h)^^N)/log(f(x)^^N))^^h = lim h->infinity ((log(f(x+1/h))/log(f(x)))^^h)^^N Do you think it can be correct? I can't understand the formula, but one question is why have f(x) as opposed to x?  Are you trying to iterate f(x)???   Also one assumes you are only interested in this limit for exp(-e)<=a<=exp(1/e),  $\lim_{h\to\infty}a\uparrow\uparrow h$  otherwise it is not defined.  if  exp(-e)<=a<=exp(1/e), then it is the real attracting fixed point of a^L=L.  Is this a correct understanding of your intentions? update: Also, the 1/h terms in your equation drop out as h->infinity.  Then you have:                 (log(x^^N)/log(x^^N))^^h = ((log(x)/log(x))^^h)^^N The ^^h is interpreted as the attracting fixed point.  The attracting fixed point of a^^infty as a approaches 1 also approaches a:  fixed(a^^infity) ~=  a + (a-1)^2 + O(a-1)^3, So the numerators equal the denominators and we are left with 1 = 1 - Sheldon Xorter Fellow Posts: 79 Threads: 26 Joined: Aug 2016 11/28/2017, 05:45 PM (11/28/2017, 04:15 PM)sheldonison Wrote: I can't understand the formula, but one question is why have f(x) as opposed to x?  Are you trying to iterate f(x)???   Also one assumes you are only interested in this limit for exp(-e)<=a<=exp(1/e),  $\lim_{h\to\infty}a\uparrow\uparrow h$  otherwise it is not defined.  if  exp(-e)<=a<=exp(1/e), then it is the real attracting fixed point of a^L=L.  Is this a correct understanding of your intentions? Well, first of all, f(x) is any function, it can be x^2+3, cos(x), x, ... etc. No, I have not tried iterate f(x) (functionally like f^oN), because these formulas are based on the iteration of addition (multiplication, exponentiation,...etc.), but I could try it, why not? In fact it is not the lim h->infinity a^^h, because that is equals to W(-ln(a))/-ln(a). I have been looking for lim h->0 super h-th root of a. You know, x^^(1/y) is not super y-th root of x, right? This is my big problem, but I believe it might be our advantage. Xorter Unizo Xorter Fellow Posts: 79 Threads: 26 Joined: Aug 2016 11/29/2017, 11:53 AM (This post was last modified: 11/30/2017, 04:33 PM by Xorter.) We must notice that lim h->infinity a^^(1/h) = 1 and lim h->infinity super 1/h-th root of a = infinity, but lim h->infinity super 1/h-th root of a^^(1/h) = a So for the most of non-trivial functions it gives interesting results. Yes, as you said lim->infinity log( f(x+1/h) )/log( f(x) ) approaches to 1, but the whole result by the super root will not approach to only 1 or only infinity. The remaining question is that: How can we calculate lim h->infinity super 1/h-th root of f(x,h)? Update: I have an interesting formula for super roots like this: super Nth root of A = (A^(1/(x^^(N-1))))^oInfinity So we are looking for the fixed point of the formula above. It also shows that: super 1st root of A = A and lim h->0 super h-th root of A = infinity Update: I have a code, too for Super Zeroth RooT of a number (h->infinity): Code:szrt(a,h)={ x=a; for(i=0,h,sexpinit(x);x=sexp(1/h-1);x=a^(1/x)); return(x); }But somewhy, fatou.gp does not work at this point. Could anyone give me an advice how have it worked? Thank you. Xorter Unizo « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Inverse super-composition Xorter 11 5,022 05/26/2018, 12:00 AM Last Post: Xorter Solving tetration using differintegrals and super-roots JmsNxn 0 887 08/22/2016, 10:07 PM Last Post: JmsNxn Cellular auto : rule 30 number ? tommy1729 0 585 08/03/2016, 08:31 PM Last Post: tommy1729 The super of exp(z)(z^2 + 1) + z. tommy1729 1 1,348 03/15/2016, 01:02 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Super-root 3 andydude 10 5,730 01/19/2016, 03:14 AM Last Post: andydude [rule 30] Is it possible to easily rewrite rule 30 in terms of modular arithmetic ? tommy1729 0 935 07/24/2014, 11:09 PM Last Post: tommy1729 super of exp + 2pi i ? tommy1729 1 2,303 08/18/2013, 09:20 PM Last Post: tommy1729 A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition JmsNxn 2 4,434 09/06/2011, 02:00 AM Last Post: JmsNxn Principal Branch of the Super-logarithm andydude 7 10,564 06/20/2011, 09:32 PM Last Post: tommy1729 e is the global maximum of x root x, 2 root 2 = 4 root 4, so... robo37 4 4,242 02/15/2011, 05:08 PM Last Post: bo198214

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)