Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Notation Question (raising the highest value in pow-tower to a different power)
#7
(02/18/2019, 05:08 AM)jaydfox Wrote:


Using the notation that you discuss here, I believe that the function I am curious about may be represented more elegantly by using the notation for it shown below: 

 

Here the z subscript denotes that the base of the exponentiation in this case is the real valued z.  If I were to expand the above function would the notation equate to the following? 

 

Thanks for the discussion, and advice on inserting TeX properly. 

-Micah
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A Notation Question (raising the highest value in pow-tower to a different power) - by Micah - 02/18/2019, 08:33 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Kneser method question tommy1729 9 824 02/11/2020, 01:26 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Could there be an "arctic geometry" by raising the rank of all operations? Syzithryx 2 941 07/24/2019, 05:59 PM
Last Post: Syzithryx
  Math overflow question on fractional exponential iterations sheldonison 4 4,095 04/01/2018, 03:09 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Functional power Xorter 0 1,428 03/11/2017, 10:22 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  2 fixpoints related by power ? tommy1729 0 1,576 12/07/2016, 01:29 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 1,706 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Inverse power tower functions tommy1729 0 1,964 01/04/2016, 12:03 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [MO] Is there a tetration for infinite cardinalities? (Question in MO) Gottfried 10 12,756 12/28/2014, 10:22 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Remark on Gottfried's "problem with an infinite product" power tower variation tommy1729 4 5,430 05/06/2014, 09:47 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  about power towers and base change tommy1729 7 8,723 05/04/2014, 08:30 AM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)