bo198214 Wrote:Ivars Wrote:
What do you mean by? Btw.
has tex code
.Code:\lim_{n\to\infty}
Thanks.
It is the same as
This limit is called rotation or winding number.
In my simulation, when n=1829,
Infinite tetration giving I*Omega costant=I*0.567143...
|
bo198214 Wrote:Ivars Wrote: Thanks. It is the same as This limit is called rotation or winding number. In my simulation, when n=1829, Ivars Wrote:Thanks. Ok that means I put some effort into investigating this sequence (1) If So that if For example in our case If vice versa We put now into (1) The interesting cases is (a) if If If In this case so case (b) is occurs exactly for So in the case As a last step we give conditions for c) Let In the case The condition Now we know that The condition Similarly to the previous case the condition is satisfied for: We know that Now going backwards we get Proposition. Let If there exists an Verify the conditions for your choice: The last condition that So for your choice but also many other choices for PS: By the length of the derivations I can not exclude that somewhere got an error into the computations, so dont take the result as granted. bo198214 Wrote:Ok that means Thanks, It will .... take me some time to digest. I do not quite understand the first assumption, Quote: one can see numerically that in the limit As far as I did it (1850 terms), nothing is constant-You mean you replaced small difference of sin from -1 with an argument? But as sin argument nears n*(3pi/2), can You do it? As I see it since teta(n+1)-teta(n) = 1 when n-> infinity, there shall be no differences between teta(n) and n integer part. There can not be one also in reals, since limit n->infinity is 1. So this constant seems suspicious to me-or may be I misunderstood something. Ivars
03/09/2008, 01:16 PM
Ivars Wrote:Quote: one can see numerically that in the limit Whats not clear about this? Just compute |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|