Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Improved infinite composition method
#1
                   
Here I present my latest improved method of the infinite composition method we started talking about in 2021.

Let x be complex with Re(x) > 1.

Consider f(x) = exp(t(x-1) * f(x-1)) = exp(t(x-1) * exp(t(x-2) * f(x-2)) = exp...

One of James last considerations was t(x) = 1/( exp(-x) + 1). (well almost , he considered the isomorphic case f(x) = t(x-1) * exp(f(x-1)) ) )

I came up with t(x) = 1/(gamma(-x,1) + 1).

Now I propose another function t(x).

Alot can be said but I wont go into details yet.
However some pictures might say more than words, so I will add a few.

I will not talk about poles singularities and zero's for now. I will pretent they do not exist at the moment to avoid complications.

This ofcourse follows from the general sigmoid type function ideas ( t(x) = 1/ something ).

I also note that in general t(x) = 1/( too-fast(x) + 1) is generally to chaotic to work for most " too-fast functions " such like triple exp growth rate.
The pictures and proposed function might clarify that.

I worked with sage for the proposed function and plots.

So copied from sage I used :
---

complex_plot(h(x)*h(2*x)*h(3*x)*h(4*x)*h(5*x),(-40,40),(-40,40))
Launched png viewer for Graphics object consisting of 1 graphics primitive
sage: h(x)
1/(e^(2*x^(3/2)*sinh(-sqrt(x))) + 1)

---

where t(x) = h(x)*h(2*x)*h(3*x)*h(4*x)*h(5*x)

This gives faster convergeance in a sufficiently large domain.

The many products were neccessary to avoid infinite switches from near 1 to near 0 , again see pictures.

( black is zero , white is infinity , other colors are arguments )


regards

Tom Marcel Raes
tommy1729
Reply
#2
the second picture from the top ( in black and red ) should be my t(x).
Reply
#3
Really cool, Tommy!

I really think this is going to open up a whole new swath of uniqueness problems...

I'm excited to see derivations!

Regards, James
Reply
#4
OK bad news.

This does not seem to work out ...

I Will post another thread with another method.
Reply
#5
(07/09/2021, 03:15 AM)tommy1729 Wrote: OK bad news.

This does not seem to work out ...

I Will post another thread with another method.
Mathematicians who are aware of their mistakes end up producing much better work.
Reply
#6
(07/09/2021, 09:46 AM)Daniel Wrote:
(07/09/2021, 03:15 AM)tommy1729 Wrote: OK bad news.

This does not seem to work out ...

I Will post another thread with another method.
Mathematicians who are aware of their mistakes end up producing much better work.

People tend to gloss over how much of mathematics is editing, and edit upon edit...
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Arguments for the beta method not being Kneser's method JmsNxn 51 3,180 11 hours ago
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The Generalized Gaussian Method (GGM) tommy1729 0 107 09/25/2021, 12:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  tommy's singularity theorem and connection to kneser and gaussian method tommy1729 2 232 09/20/2021, 04:29 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Why the beta-method is non-zero in the upper half plane JmsNxn 0 208 09/01/2021, 01:57 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Tommy's Gaussian method. tommy1729 20 2,562 08/19/2021, 09:40 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Composition, bullet notation and the general role of categories MphLee 8 2,378 05/19/2021, 12:25 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  A different approach to the base-change method JmsNxn 0 603 03/17/2021, 11:15 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  A support for Andy's (P.Walker's) slog-matrix-method Gottfried 4 4,548 03/08/2021, 07:13 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Doubts on the domains of Nixon's method. MphLee 1 852 03/02/2021, 10:43 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  My interpolation method [2020] tommy1729 1 2,463 02/20/2020, 08:40 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)