Login

JmsNxn · (This post was last modified: 08/26/2021, 07:10 AM by JmsNxn.)

This will be a somewhat short thread, as I'm trying to showcase a crazy cool feature of tetration. This is a note on the absolute chaos of how these functions work. To begin, here is a graph:

Filename: 3 tetrations ten to the neg 2.png Size: 11.75 KB 08/26/2021, 05:58 AM

Although this may look like a linear graph, this is actually three tetrations being graphed. These would be,

$ F_{\log(2)}(x)\\ F_{\log(5)}(x)\\ F_{\log(7)}(x)\\ $

over the domain $x \in [-0.001,0.001]$ . They almost agree exactly, with only a slight change in numbers. But, if you've been following my research. Each are holomorphic for,

$ F_{\log(2)}(x)\,\,\text{is holomorphic for}\,\,|\Im(z)| < \pi/\log(2)\,\,\Re(z) > 0\\ F_{\log(5)}(x)\,\,\text{is holomorphic for}\,\,|\Im(z)| < \pi/\log(5)\,\,\Re(z) > 0\\ F_{\log(7)}(x)\,\,\text{is holomorphic for}\,\,|\Im(z)| < \pi/\log(7)\,\,\Re(z) > 0\\ $

So they are not the same holomorphic functions. There are singularities on the boundaries of these domains too--so these domains are maximal in a sense. There's an almost fuzz between them which make them each unique, yet, absolutely undistinguishable to the eye. Here is a zoomed out version of this graph at $x \in [-0.25,0.25]$ :

Filename: 3 tetrations point 25.png Size: 12 KB 08/26/2021, 06:05 AM

We can see a tad more straying here, but no hint that these are actually 3 different analytic functions! It just looks like a weird graph of one function! The craziest picture is a zoomed out full picture. Here are the above three tetrations graphed over $x \in [-1,2]$ :

Filename: 3 tetrations full.png Size: 11.86 KB 08/26/2021, 06:10 AM

This is to say, as we vary the multiplier $\lambda$ in $F_\lambda$ we actually only incite a tiny wobble. And different wobbles correspond to different $\lambda$ (almost like a frequency), but for the most part it's undetectable up to at least 3 digits.

Now to make these graphs I stuck to 9 digit precision, But at 9 digits.... for $x \in [-0.000000001,0.000000001]$ :

Filename: 3 tetrations atoms.png Size: 9.54 KB 08/26/2021, 06:17 AM

We can finally start to see that these are different tetrations. Please note that the boxy nature of this graph is because it's made of only a couple sample points. If you went full hi-res though, this would be a 9 digit accurate result.

I just thought this was really cool. And that, it's nearly impossible to distinguish between $F_{\log(2)}$ and $F_{\log(5)}$ on the real-line. But they are holomorphic on different domains.

I thought this was really cool, figured I'd share.

Regards, James

I thought I'd post another graph to fill the quota. Here is the graph of $F_{\log(2)}(x) - F_{\log(5)}(x)$ over $x \in [-1,1]$ :

Filename: wobble.png Size: 15.33 KB 08/26/2021, 07:10 AM

JmsNxn · (This post was last modified: 09/11/2021, 01:42 AM by JmsNxn.)

Okay, I've been compiling a bunch of graphic information. And if we call,

$ F_\lambda(s) = \lim_{n\to\infty} \log^{\circ n}\beta_\lambda(s+x_\lambda+n)\\ F_\lambda(0) = 1\,\,\text{for all}\,\, \Re(\lambda)>0\\ F_\lambda(s+1) = \exp(F_\lambda(s))\\ F_\lambda(s) : \mathbb{R}^+ \times \mathbb{R}^+ \to \mathbb{R}^+\\ $

Then,

$ \text{tet}_\beta(s) = \lim_{\lambda\to 0^+} F_\lambda(s)\\ $

What this is essentially saying is that we can interchange the limits. The construction I had was,

$ \text{tet}_\beta(s) = \lim_{n\to\infty} \lim_{\lambda \to 0^+} \beta_\lambda(s+n+x_\lambda)\,\,\text{while}\,\,\lambda = \mathcal{O}(n^{-\epsilon})\,\,\text{for}\,\,0 < \epsilon < 1\\ $

But we can do one better by writing,

$ \text{tet}_\beta(s) =\lim_{n\to\infty} \lim_{\lambda \to 0^+} \beta_\lambda(s+n+x_\lambda)\,\,\text{while}\,\,\lambda = \mathcal{O}(n^{-\epsilon})\,\,\text{for}\,\,0 < \epsilon < 1\\ = \lim_{\lambda \to 0^+}\lim_{n\to\infty} \beta_\lambda(s+n+x_\lambda) = \lim_{\lambda \to 0^+} F_\lambda(s)\\ $

And that my construction was existence/construction; but once that's shown--we can use alternative ways of representing. We can just limit the multiplier to zero. We don't need anything too fancy.

This is to entice the reader into thinking that we are really just expanding the strip of holomorphy. Where,

$ F_1(z)\,\,\text{is holomorphic for}\,\, |\Im(z)| < \pi\,\,\text{excluding}\,\,(-\infty,-2]\\ F_{0.5}(z)\,\,\text{is holomorphic for}\,\, |\Im(z)| < 2\pi\,\,\text{excluding}\,\,(-\infty,-2]\\ F_{0.25}(z)\,\,\text{is holomorphic for}\,\, |\Im(z)| < 4\pi\,\,\text{excluding}\,\,(-\infty,-2]\\ F_{0.125}(z)\,\,\text{is holomorphic for}\,\, |\Im(z)| < 8 \pi\,\,\text{excluding}\,\,(-\infty,-2]\\ F_{0.0625}(z)\,\,\text{is holomorphic for}\,\, |\Im(z)| < 16 \pi\,\,\text{excluding}\,\,(-\infty,-2]\\ \vdots\\ \text{tet}_\beta(z)\,\,\text{is holomorphic for}\,\,z\in\mathbb{C}\,\,\text{excluding}\,\,(-\infty,-2]\\ $

I think this is the revelation I've been looking for. I'm able to make graphs of say $F_{0.1}(z)$ much better than I can make a graph of $\lim_{n\to\infty} \log^{\circ n} \beta(z+n)$ ; however, on the real line they barely disagree--about an error of 1E-10. So, as I see it; this cracks the code of how to map the Riemann sphere so that $\lim_{\Im z \to \infty} \text{tet}_\beta(z) = \infty$ . We've literally just shrunk the multiplier to zero.

So the periodic function $\lambda(z)$ is actually just $\lambda = 0$ ; how cool is that!?!?!?!?

Guys, this is the cracked code of the beta method! The trivial solution to the equation,

$ \text{tet}_\beta(z) = F_{\lambda(z)}(z)\\ \lambda(z+1) = \lambda(z)\\ \lim_{\Im z \to \infty} \lambda(z) = 0\\ $

IS THE CORRECT SOLUTION! I can't believe I was always "normalizing" at the end. The trick is to include the function $x_\lambda$ in the construction. All I have to do is show that the interchange of limits is perfectly legal; which isn't much. It's just ensuring on compact sets the limit stays stable. I'm so god damn excited! Can't believe I didn't think of this !

Regards, James

Here's a graph of $F_{\log(1.5)}(z)$ over the domain $-2 \le \Re(z) \le 3$ and $0 \le \Im(z) \le 5$ ; which is almost $\text{tet}_\beta$ ; there's about a $1 E -3$ discrepancy on the real line. This function is holomorphic for about $|\Im(z)| \le 7$ excluding the branch cut.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	On the [tex]2 \pi i[/tex]-periodic solution to tetration, base e	JmsNxn	0	85	09/28/2021, 05:44 AM Last Post: JmsNxn
	Constructing real tetration solutions	Daniel	4	5,463	12/24/2019, 12:10 AM Last Post: sheldonison
	Half-iterates and periodic stuff , my mod method [2019]	tommy1729	0	1,991	09/09/2019, 10:55 PM Last Post: tommy1729
	b^b^x with base 0<b<e^-e have three real fixpoints	Gottfried	1	4,741	11/07/2017, 11:06 AM Last Post: sheldonison
	Are tetrations fixed points analytic?	JmsNxn	2	6,016	12/14/2016, 08:50 PM Last Post: JmsNxn
	Periodic analytic iterations by Riemann mapping	tommy1729	1	4,352	03/05/2016, 10:07 PM Last Post: tommy1729
	2 real fixpoints again .......	tommy1729	10	17,945	02/23/2016, 10:17 PM Last Post: tommy1729
	A new set of numbers is necessary to extend tetration to real exponents.	marraco	7	16,177	03/19/2015, 10:45 PM Last Post: marraco
	Can sexp(z) be periodic ??	tommy1729	2	6,687	01/14/2015, 01:19 PM Last Post: tommy1729
	[2014] Uniqueness of periodic superfunction	tommy1729	0	3,337	11/09/2014, 10:20 PM Last Post: tommy1729