Laws and Orders

Thread Rating:

Thread Modes

Laws and Orders

GFR $Offline$
Member

Posts: 174
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2007

#15

04/27/2008, 12:50 AM

Concerning the DL, I prefer my "implication", i.e.:
IF a[s]x = x, THEN x = a[s+1]oo

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/23/2008, 09:17 AM

RE: Laws and Orders - by andydude - 04/23/2008, 11:44 AM

RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 04/24/2008, 06:39 AM

RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/24/2008, 09:38 AM

RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 04/24/2008, 06:24 PM

RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/25/2008, 04:40 PM

RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 04/25/2008, 08:24 PM

RE: Laws and Orders - by bo198214 - 04/26/2008, 10:43 PM

RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/27/2008, 12:50 AM

RE: Laws and Orders - by bo198214 - 04/27/2008, 10:56 AM

RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 04/27/2008, 10:18 PM

RE: Laws and Orders - by GFR - 05/02/2008, 09:47 PM

RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 05/20/2008, 07:08 PM

RE: Laws and Orders - by Ivars - 05/25/2008, 03:10 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders?	VSO	2	3,906	09/09/2019, 10:38 PM Last Post: tommy1729

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)