Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp
#13
Sorry, but I dont see any meaning for hyper operations in defining a fucked up function that is so crude that you can not define them on the reals.

That may be an interestic topic for itself but then rather goes in the direction of Cantor sets or general topology. Good luck.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp - by bo198214 - 06/03/2008, 05:14 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The AB functions ! tommy1729 0 1,605 04/04/2017, 11:00 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  the inverse ackerman functions JmsNxn 3 6,003 09/18/2016, 11:02 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  Look-alike functions. tommy1729 1 2,080 03/08/2016, 07:10 PM
Last Post: hixidom
  Inverse power tower functions tommy1729 0 1,920 01/04/2016, 12:03 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2014] composition of 3 functions. tommy1729 0 1,817 08/25/2014, 12:08 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Intresting functions not ? tommy1729 4 5,196 03/05/2014, 06:49 PM
Last Post: razrushil
  generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 22,367 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Discrete-analytic functions Ansus 4 5,757 07/30/2011, 04:46 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  product functions tommy1729 5 6,523 06/01/2011, 05:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Periodic functions that are periodic not by addition JmsNxn 0 2,795 04/17/2011, 09:54 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)