Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
simple idea ...
#1
a simple idea ... maybe considered before ?

let us approximate exp(x) with polynomials of degree n.

let us call that exp_n(x).

now we can solve for f_n(f_n(x)) = exp_n(x)

if n is large enough and then f_n(x) being a polynomial of degree < n.

( we ignore the terms of degree > n in f_n(f_n(x)) )

now if lim f_n(x) exists we got f(x) with f(f(x) = exp(x).


....

headscratch ...


regards

tommy1729
Reply
#2
tommy1729 Wrote:headscratch ...
That doesn't work. Suppose then . Chopping off the second series gives which is false.
Reply
#3
andydude Wrote:
tommy1729 Wrote:headscratch ...
That doesn't work. Suppose then . Chopping off the second series gives which is false.

well , thanks for your reply andy.

but i dont agree , and i assume you misunderstood what i meant.

in your example there is nothing to chop off ?

the degree of f(f(x)) = 4 just as desired.

what is ignored is more something like this

( with some imagination , example not so good )

f(x) = a + b x^4 + (x^17) / 17!

f(f(x)) = polynomial of degree 16 + ' some terms of degree > 16 '

' those terms of degree > 16 ' are caused by the x^17 part so they are dropped.

they are pretty small for some x afterall since i took x ^17 / 17!

that is important , what we ignore must be relatively small.

but exp(x) has a fast converging taylor series so *that* should probably not be a problem.

however in the OP i assumed a limit , that might be trickier.

but i believe that when taking the limit in a good way , we have chance at succeeding ...

i hope this clarifies a bit ...


regards

tommy1729
Reply
#4
tommy1729 Wrote:i hope this clarifies a bit ...

Nope. Still head scratching.
Reply
#5
andydude Wrote:Nope. Still head scratching.

Me too.
Most polynomials have no polynomial half iterate, so how can your suggestion work?
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Nixon-Banach-Lambert-Raes tetration is analytic , simple and “ closed form “ !! tommy1729 7 124 01/19/2021, 01:27 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  tommy's simple solution ln^[n](2sinh^[n+x](z)) tommy1729 1 3,852 01/17/2017, 07:21 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  A simple yet unsolved equation for slog(z) ? tommy1729 0 2,555 04/27/2014, 08:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Simple method for half iterate NOT based on a fixpoint. tommy1729 2 4,817 04/30/2013, 09:33 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  simple base conversion formula for tetration JmsNxn 0 4,028 09/22/2011, 07:41 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  (draft) integral idea tommy1729 0 3,044 06/25/2011, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  2 simple statements tommy1729 0 2,427 09/01/2010, 03:25 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  simple equation for R -> R tommy1729 2 5,499 08/13/2010, 12:28 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Simple Question about e^(1/e) rsgerard 7 11,726 05/26/2010, 06:04 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  meromorphic idea tommy1729 2 5,931 05/13/2009, 11:18 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)