Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Functional super-iteration and hierarchy of functional hyper-iterations
(05/04/2009, 01:06 AM)Tetratophile Wrote: Yes. x can, in principle, be any function*; interpreting the "iterants" (the n in f [It_k] n) as constant functions rather than as simply numbers is what makes the hierarchy possible (since a function outputs numbers we can use as iterant). I should have written the iterant as g(x) to emphasize that.

But anyway its no *definition*.
See have your original equation:

and lets add the initial condition:

Interpreting x as constant function, with the above lines we can derive the function
for any constant function .
And that is all! We can no derive what means for any non-constant function . Just because on the left side there are only constant functions in the second argument.

Well if we allow any function for , not only constant functions, then it is still no definition, because we have no initial condition, which stops the recursion.
For a constant function , the right side needs to evaluate in the second argument, to evaluate this it must be evaluated at and so on until one derives at m=1. This the initial condition and the recursion is finished.

If you put however any function there then on the right side in the second argument needs to be evaluated then then and so on but this recursion does never stop because never becomes a constant function for which we know how to evaluate.

Think of writing a computer program to evaluate your operator. It can not guess what your intention was for non-constant second arguments. But I can guess and thatswhy I proposed the definition I gave.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Functional super-iteration and hierarchy of functional composition-based operations - by bo198214 - 05/04/2009, 07:56 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Moving between Abel's and Schroeder's Functional Equations Daniel 1 529 01/16/2020, 10:08 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  [MSE] Shape of orbit of iterations with base b on Shell-Thron-region Gottfried 14 4,730 12/13/2019, 02:33 PM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 2 955 09/09/2019, 10:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Is bugs or features for super-logarithm? Ember Edison 10 4,154 08/07/2019, 02:44 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition JmsNxn 4 7,527 06/23/2019, 08:19 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 4,810 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Inverse super-composition Xorter 11 14,427 05/26/2018, 12:00 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  Math overflow question on fractional exponential iterations sheldonison 4 4,405 04/01/2018, 03:09 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The super 0th root and a new rule of tetration? Xorter 4 4,582 11/29/2017, 11:53 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  Hyper-volume by integration Xorter 0 1,605 04/08/2017, 01:52 PM
Last Post: Xorter

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)