• 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension bo198214 Administrator Posts: 1,389 Threads: 90 Joined: Aug 2007 08/23/2009, 03:23 PM (This post was last modified: 08/23/2009, 03:27 PM by bo198214.) (08/23/2009, 02:45 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: bo198214 Wrote:For $k\ge 1$ the constant -1 vanishes and we make the following calculations: $s^{(k)}(x)=(t(b^x))^{(k)}=\left(\sum_{i=0}^\infty \nu_i \frac{b^{xi}}{i!}\right)^{(k)}=\sum_{i=0}^\infty\frac{\nu_i}{i!}(b^{xi})^{(k)}$ The derivation of $b^{xi}$ is easily determined to be $(b^{xi})'=b^{xi}\text{ln}(b) i$ and so the k-th derivative is $(b^{xi})^{(k)} = b^{xi}(\text{ln}(b)i)^k$, which give us in turn $\nu_k=s(x)^{(k)}= \text{ln}(b)^k\sum_{i=0}^\infty\nu_i\frac{i^k}{i!}$ for $k\ge 1$.notice in the last line bo wrote s(x) instead of s(0). which is obviously a misprint. The corresponding equation system for arbitrary $x_0$ is: $\nu_k(x_0)=s^{(k)}(x_0)= \text{ln}(b)^k\sum_{i=0}^\infty\nu_i \cdot \frac{ b^{x_0 i}\cdot i^k}{i!}$ for $k\ge 1$. Quote:it is an expansion at x = 0. now if we consider expansions at both x = 0 and x = 1 and get the same coefficients for x = 0 by computing them from 1) the coefficients expanded at x = 1 2) solving the modified equation ( see below) I doubt this. I guess we get different superlogarithms for different development points $x_0$. One should perhaps check this with a complex plot. I further guess that for $x_0$ converging to the lower fixed point, the solution converges to the regular tetration. And 3. I guess that Andrew's slog corresponds to the inverse of the matrix power sexp (which also depends on a development point). Quote:since b^1 i = b^i , we get an extra b^i factor on the right side. *nods* Quote:and v_k is replaced by sum v_k / k! If you have a function f(x) with powerseries coefficients $v_k$ at 0 then f(x+d) has the powerseries development coefficients v_k(d) (provided that f has convergence radius >d at 0): $v_k(d) = \sum_{n=k}^\infty \left(n\\k\right) d^{n-k} v_n$ and vice versa $v_k = \sum_{n=k}^\infty \left(n\\k\right) (-d)^{n-k} v_n(d)$. Quote:bo mentioned the potential non-uniqueness for v_k when expanded at x = 0. maybe this could be the extra condition we(?) are looking for. The demand that the solution at different development points should give the same function does not determine how to solve the equation system in a different way. If you mean that. « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 08/07/2007, 04:38 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 08/18/2007, 08:20 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 08/19/2007, 09:50 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 08/20/2007, 02:22 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by andydude - 11/12/2007, 08:43 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by tommy1729 - 06/26/2009, 10:51 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 06/27/2009, 09:39 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by tommy1729 - 06/28/2009, 12:08 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by jaydfox - 11/06/2007, 04:17 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by jaydfox - 11/06/2007, 04:27 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 11/06/2007, 10:57 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by jaydfox - 11/06/2007, 01:58 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 11/06/2007, 03:58 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by jaydfox - 11/12/2007, 09:14 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by andydude - 11/12/2007, 09:56 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 11/12/2007, 08:05 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by andydude - 11/13/2007, 12:16 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 11/13/2007, 10:21 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by andydude - 11/13/2007, 05:45 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by Gottfried - 03/17/2008, 07:52 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by Gottfried - 03/17/2008, 06:09 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by tommy1729 - 06/29/2009, 08:20 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by andydude - 07/27/2009, 08:10 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by tommy1729 - 08/11/2009, 12:18 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by jaydfox - 08/11/2009, 07:06 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by jaydfox - 08/11/2009, 07:12 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by tommy1729 - 08/23/2009, 02:45 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 08/23/2009, 03:23 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by tommy1729 - 08/26/2009, 04:01 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by andydude - 09/04/2009, 06:42 AM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by Gottfried - 12/28/2009, 05:21 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by tommy1729 - 08/18/2016, 12:29 PM RE: Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by Gottfried - 08/22/2016, 04:19 PM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Possible continuous extension of tetration to the reals Dasedes 0 1,673 10/10/2016, 04:57 AM Last Post: Dasedes Non-trivial extension of max(n,1)-1 to the reals and its iteration. MphLee 3 4,618 05/17/2014, 07:10 PM Last Post: MphLee extension of the Ackermann function to operators less than addition JmsNxn 2 4,737 11/06/2011, 08:06 PM Last Post: JmsNxn Tetration Extension to Real Heights chobe 3 7,045 05/15/2010, 01:39 AM Last Post: bo198214 Tetration extension for bases between 1 and eta dantheman163 16 22,292 12/19/2009, 10:55 AM Last Post: bo198214 Extension of tetration to other branches mike3 15 24,357 10/28/2009, 07:42 AM Last Post: bo198214 andrew slog tommy1729 1 3,910 06/17/2009, 06:37 PM Last Post: bo198214 Dmitrii Kouznetsov's Tetration Extension andydude 38 43,881 11/20/2008, 01:31 AM Last Post: Kouznetsov Hooshmand's extension of tetration andydude 9 11,941 08/14/2008, 04:48 AM Last Post: Danesh

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)