Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Real and complex behaviour of the base change function (was: The "cheta" function)
#15
(08/15/2009, 09:44 PM)bo198214 Wrote:
(08/15/2009, 07:13 PM)jaydfox Wrote: Note that this grid of points covers the entire right half of the complex plane, so that when we iteratively perform logarithms, we can always find points close to the real line.

But still I dont get this. Iterated (branches of) logarithms take any point to one of the fixed points of exp. Why do they come arbitrary close to the real axis with increasing n?
I hope the picture will clarify.

I hope so.

The reason, of course, has to do with our choice of starting point. We want log^[n](-1), which as you point out, would seem to go to a fixed point.

But consider the first of the n iterated logarithms. If you choose the log(-1) at pi*i, then yes, you are going to descend into a fixed point as you continue taking iterated logarithms.

But notice that my first choice of log(-1) is way out on the imaginary line, maybe at something like (10^100 + 1)*pi*i. Notice that, even in the primary branch of the logarithm, it will take quite a while for us to get near the fixed point, and indeed, the iterated logarithms will get very close to the real line.

Well, without further ado, I will start showing some pictures (sagenb.org came back online):

   

This first picture is to show the case of n=4. I find log(log(-1)), in the principal branch, and I get 1.14472988584940 + 1.57079632679490*I. I create a straight line from 0 to this point, which is the blue line in the picture.

The exponentiation of this line gives me a curve with 1 and pi*i as endpoints, which is the green curve in the picture.

Finally, the second exponentiation gives me a curve with endpoints of e and -1. Note that with two iterations remaining, I will get a singularity when I get to the third iterated logarithm in base eta.
~ Jay Daniel Fox
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Real and complex behaviour of the base change function (was: The "cheta" function - by jaydfox - 08/15/2009, 10:40 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Complex Tetration, to base exp(1/e) Ember Edison 7 908 08/14/2019, 09:15 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Is there a function space for tetration? Chenjesu 0 154 06/23/2019, 08:24 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 1,395 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Degamma function Xorter 0 644 10/22/2018, 11:29 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  b^b^x with base 0<b<e^-e have three real fixpoints Gottfried 1 1,963 11/07/2017, 11:06 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  An explicit series for the tetration of a complex height Vladimir Reshetnikov 13 10,365 01/14/2017, 09:09 PM
Last Post: Vladimir Reshetnikov
  Taylor series of cheta Xorter 13 10,784 08/28/2016, 08:52 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  2 real fixpoints again ....... tommy1729 10 8,067 02/23/2016, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Should tetration be a multivalued function? marraco 17 14,749 01/14/2016, 04:24 AM
Last Post: marraco
  Introducing new special function : Lambert_t(z,r) tommy1729 2 3,192 01/10/2016, 06:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)