Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Real and complex behaviour of the base change function (was: The "cheta" function)
#21
Ya perhaps that line of thought will not contribute to our topic.
My concern was about the difference of points just somehow converging to the real axis, compared with that they indeed come close to every single point of the real axis.
But this seems to be true.
To properly verify this we need to show that for each and for every there exist natural numbers and such that .

However did we silently switch from base change () to the base change ()?
I think we are more interested in the first one!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Real and complex behaviour of the base change function (was: The "cheta" function - by bo198214 - 08/17/2009, 08:50 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Complex Tetration, to base exp(1/e) Ember Edison 7 1,233 08/14/2019, 09:15 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Is there a function space for tetration? Chenjesu 0 241 06/23/2019, 08:24 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 1,929 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Degamma function Xorter 0 713 10/22/2018, 11:29 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  b^b^x with base 0<b<e^-e have three real fixpoints Gottfried 1 2,089 11/07/2017, 11:06 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  An explicit series for the tetration of a complex height Vladimir Reshetnikov 13 10,782 01/14/2017, 09:09 PM
Last Post: Vladimir Reshetnikov
  Taylor series of cheta Xorter 13 11,277 08/28/2016, 08:52 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  2 real fixpoints again ....... tommy1729 10 8,345 02/23/2016, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Should tetration be a multivalued function? marraco 17 15,285 01/14/2016, 04:24 AM
Last Post: marraco
  Introducing new special function : Lambert_t(z,r) tommy1729 2 3,312 01/10/2016, 06:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)