Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pentation's definitional ambiguity
#11
Go in the negative direction from z=-1 in the complex plane. Set the cut lines from even negative numbers run to negative IMAGINARY infinity; and odd negative numbers to positive IMAGINARY (screwed that up, sorry) infinity. what happens then? your path can just zigzag between the upper and lower half planes without circling any of the singularities once. I may be wrong about how the cut lines of the double logarithmic singularities can be set.
Reply
#12
(12/15/2009, 08:52 PM)Base-Acid Tetration Wrote: Go in the negative direction from z=-1 in the complex plane. Set the cut lines from even negative numbers run to negativeinfinity; and odd negative numbers to positive infinity. what happens then? your path can just zigzag between the upper and lower half planes without circling any of the singularities once.

If the domain is not simply connected (i.e. each two paths in the domain are homotopic) you probably can not define tetration there.
Reply
#13
(12/15/2009, 10:56 PM)bo198214 Wrote: If the domain is not simply connected (i.e. each two paths in the domain are homotopic) you probably can not define tetration there.

You can see that the domain that I defined is indeed simply connected.
I meant negative and positive IMAGINARY infinities. screwed that up...
   
Reply
#14
(12/15/2009, 11:08 PM)Base-Acid Tetration Wrote: You can see that the domain that I defined is indeed simply connected. is there something I missed?

Ah, ok, then your description was wrong (you said negative and positive infinity but you meant negative and positive imaginary infinity).
Hm, ok, but what do you want to show with this construction?
Reply
#15
(12/15/2009, 11:15 PM)bo198214 Wrote: Hm, ok, but what do you want to show with this construction?

i meant to show that you didn't have to circle the singularities an integer number of times.
but by the arbitrariness of definition of the principal branch of the logarithm, the fact was utterly trivial!
the branch I am giving is pieced from these branches, written in mike3's notation:
for the nth branch point.

Also tetration is now defined for the whole real line \ integers < -2, but those are useless as the while riemann surface has everything that maps to each of the values in [-2,-1].
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  pentation and hexation sheldonison 7 5,802 09/04/2017, 04:07 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Tetration is pentation. This deserve more thinking. marraco 2 3,056 03/30/2015, 02:54 PM
Last Post: marraco
  [2015] 4th Zeration from base change pentation tommy1729 5 5,029 03/29/2015, 05:47 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Mizugadro, pentation, Book Kouznetsov 41 38,653 03/02/2015, 08:13 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Infinite Pentation (and x-srt-x) andydude 20 23,779 05/31/2011, 10:29 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Regular "pentation"? mike3 12 18,691 04/04/2011, 03:16 AM
Last Post: BenStandeven
Smile Pentation roots self but please you do... nuninho1980 2 6,319 11/03/2010, 12:54 PM
Last Post: nuninho1980
  Complex fixed points of base-e tetration/tetralogarithm -> base-e pentation Base-Acid Tetration 19 27,623 10/24/2009, 04:12 AM
Last Post: andydude
  Exploring Pentation - Base e jaydfox 22 35,493 03/03/2008, 08:04 PM
Last Post: Ivars



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)