Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Something interesting about Taylor series
#1
I was playing around looking at the Taylor series of x^(x^x). This is what the first few terms looks like: http://i.imgur.com/QbRNp.png

Each term consists of (and forgive me if I don't parse it nicely) (x*ln(x))^(n+1)/n!, and then a polynomial of natural logs. If you write out the coefficients of each term in the polynomial in order, and put 1 in the first few terms with no polynomial, you get the following sequence:

1,1,1,1,1,3,1,1,7,6,1

I plugged that into Sloane's and found out that those are Stirling numbers of the second kind.

This is interesting because there have been some papers (http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.rmjm/1181072076, http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.rmjm/1250127221) that show that higher order derivatives of x^x can be described using Stirling numbers. I guess this shows that third order tetration can be described similarly.

The coefficients in the polynomials for higher order tetrations don't bring up anything in Sloane's.

Is this of interest to anyone? Also, can someone figure out the general expression for the nth term? It's just beyond my grasp right now.

Edit: After doing some more math, the Taylor series is:
[Image: BJLM3.png]

Edit 2: I now realize that the coefficient in the inner summation is just S(n,m) where m goes from 1 to n. That simplifies it. And upon some more tinkering, I found out that the entire thing inside the sum is called the Bell polynomial.

[Image: yocyz.png]
Reply
#2
Has anyone worked out the Taylor series for nth order tetration?
Reply
#3
(03/15/2010, 04:52 PM)Ztolk Wrote: Has anyone worked out the Taylor series for nth order tetration?

yes.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PowerTower.html

formula ( 6 ) , ( 7 ) and ( 8 ).

a classic.

regards

tommy1729
Reply
#4
(06/24/2010, 08:23 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PowerTower.html

formula ( 6 ) , ( 7 ) and ( 8 ).

a classic.

Hm, that is a development in , Not really a Taylor devlopment of x^^n at some point .
I wonder whether we have formulas for the powerseries development of at (and not at 0 because the powertower is not analytic there).

And indeed Andrew pointed it out in his tetration-reference formula (4.17-4.19) (or in the Andrew's older Tetration FAQ 20080112: (4.23-25)):


where:

otherwise:


I think it has convergence radius 1 because the substituted logarithm has convergence radius 1 and also because of the singularity at 0.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Perhaps a new series for log^0.5(x) Gottfried 3 1,028 03/21/2020, 08:28 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  Interesting commutative hyperoperators ? tommy1729 0 345 02/17/2020, 11:07 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Very interesting topic Ansus 0 731 10/01/2019, 08:14 PM
Last Post: Ansus
Question Taylor series of i[x] Xorter 12 14,115 02/20/2018, 09:55 PM
Last Post: Xorter
  An explicit series for the tetration of a complex height Vladimir Reshetnikov 13 14,397 01/14/2017, 09:09 PM
Last Post: Vladimir Reshetnikov
  Complaining about MSE ; attitude against tetration and iteration series ! tommy1729 0 1,930 12/26/2016, 03:01 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  2 fixpoints , 1 period --> method of iteration series tommy1729 0 1,983 12/21/2016, 01:27 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Taylor series of cheta Xorter 13 15,272 08/28/2016, 08:52 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Taylor polynomial. System of equations for the coefficients. marraco 17 19,026 08/23/2016, 11:25 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  [AIS] (alternating) Iteration series: Half-iterate using the AIS? Gottfried 33 44,210 03/27/2015, 11:28 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)