Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
closed form for regular superfunction expressed as a periodic function
#20
Please excuse - this post contains some <aaarrrgggh>s Blush
But it's worth to notice how the bell-polynomials and my -for most fellows here: still cryptic - matrix-method are related. That I didn't see this earlier

-----------------

In the mathworld-wolfram-link I find a short description of the Bell-polynomials first kind, fortunately with some example.



This expressed with my matrix-formulae is

V(t)~ * dF(-1)*S2 * V(x) = exp( (exp(t)-1)*x)

or using my standard-matrix for x->exp(x)-1 plus one intermediate step

V(t) ~ * fS2F = V(exp(t)-1)~

write "y" for "exp(t)-1"

V(y)~ * dF(-1) * V(x) = F(-1)~* dV(y)*V(x)
= F(-1)~ * V( y*x)
= exp( y*x)
= exp( (exp(t)-1)*x)

Or in one expression:

V(t) ~ * (fS2F * dF(-1)) * V(x) = exp( (exp(t)-1)*x)

(which I can recognize immediately to be correct because I'm extremely used to that notation)

or the even simpler definition of the vector of Bell-polynomials:

B(x) = S2*V(x)

So now I see at least, how the Bell-polynomials of the *first kind* are related to my matrix-lingo.
(So I should rename fS2F into "Bell" perhaps...)

----------------------------------

But then follows the Bell-polynomials of *second kind*. And there I'm lost again... No example, no redundancy... as if the reader could not do some error in parsing a complex formula...

Is there possibly meant the iteration of the Bell-polynomials (=matrix-power of S2)?
That would be simple then...

Or, wait - looking at the *subscripted* "x" I think, that they are now coefficients for some arbitrary function developed as a powerseries with reciprocal factorials, ... and then...

Well, this seems to be just the definition of what I found out myself at the very beginning of my fiddling with this subject and called it a "matrixoperator" for some function. With the additional property, that it is (lower) triangular (because of the missing x0 in the formula in mathworld), so for instance all my U_t-matrices for the decremented exponentiation (or "U-tetration to base t" in my early speak) were such collections of Bell-polynomials of second kind (but also the schröder-matrices, just all my lower-triangular matrix-operators which I worked with the last years and have the reciprocal factorial scaling <arrggh!>)

So now - if we talk about the Bell-polynomials (first or second kind) and the symbolic representation in terms of the log(L) (or log(t)) then this is just what I solved in my earlier posted link (good to know)! Here it is again: http://go.helms-net.de/math/tetdocs/APT.htm . And Faa di Bruno/Bell-polynomials and "matrixoperators" is the same and one needs only read about one side of these notations...

Amen -
<cough>
Gottfried



Gottfried Helms, Kassel
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: regular superfunction expressed as a periodic function - by Gottfried - 08/31/2010, 08:34 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Half-iterates and periodic stuff , my mod method [2019] tommy1729 0 136 09/09/2019, 10:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Is there a function space for tetration? Chenjesu 0 241 06/23/2019, 08:24 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Degamma function Xorter 0 713 10/22/2018, 11:29 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  Periodic analytic iterations by Riemann mapping tommy1729 1 2,029 03/05/2016, 10:07 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Should tetration be a multivalued function? marraco 17 15,285 01/14/2016, 04:24 AM
Last Post: marraco
  Introducing new special function : Lambert_t(z,r) tommy1729 2 3,313 01/10/2016, 06:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Natural cyclic superfunction tommy1729 3 2,753 12/08/2015, 12:09 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
Sad Tommy-Mandelbrot function tommy1729 0 1,812 04/21/2015, 01:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can sexp(z) be periodic ?? tommy1729 2 3,579 01/14/2015, 01:19 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2014] Uniqueness of periodic superfunction tommy1729 0 1,799 11/09/2014, 10:20 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)