03/16/2011, 12:04 AM

seems my quote was not relevant.

i dont know what you mean by x {y} z then.

with respect , but i find it confusingly explained.

first it was a mean , now its a kind of tetration ?

it wasnt the limiting mean i quoted , so what is it ?

perhaps define

x {y} z = ... with real math symbols instead of pseudocode.

i cannot discuss things i do not understand.

i dont know what you mean by x {y} z then.

with respect , but i find it confusingly explained.

first it was a mean , now its a kind of tetration ?

it wasnt the limiting mean i quoted , so what is it ?

perhaps define

x {y} z = ... with real math symbols instead of pseudocode.

i cannot discuss things i do not understand.