(06/04/2011, 09:19 AM)bo198214 Wrote:(06/04/2011, 09:08 AM)mike3 Wrote: So showing that it is not conjugate-symmetric at all would seem to work, no?
Then the Kneser-tetration would not be (real-)analytic in the base for base > eta.
Do you think that????
Oops, sorry, I see now, you're talking about in the base. I was referring to in the height Never mind, just missed that.
But anyway, wouldn't showing that it was not conjugate-symmetric in the height when \( b < \eta \) work?