Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rational operators (a {t} b); a,b > e solved
#28
(08/29/2016, 02:06 PM)Xorter Wrote: According to James' formula I could not tetrate. For example:
2[3]3 should be 2^^3 = 16, but according to the formula:
2[3]3 = f(2,3f(-2,2)) = f(2,3*1.869...) = 18.125...
But why? Huh

The formula only works for in x [t] y
The formula isn't really that valuable.


Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Rational operators (a {t} b); a,b > e solved - by JmsNxn - 09/01/2016, 06:47 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 2 776 09/09/2019, 10:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Hyper operators in computability theory JmsNxn 5 4,438 02/15/2017, 10:07 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Recursive formula generating bounded hyper-operators JmsNxn 0 1,623 01/17/2017, 05:10 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators JmsNxn 15 17,371 08/22/2016, 12:19 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The bounded analytic semiHyper-operators JmsNxn 2 3,827 05/27/2016, 04:03 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Bounded Analytic Hyper operators JmsNxn 25 21,431 04/01/2015, 06:09 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Incredible reduction for Hyper operators JmsNxn 0 2,375 02/13/2014, 06:20 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  interpolating the hyper operators JmsNxn 3 5,357 06/07/2013, 09:03 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Number theory and hyper operators JmsNxn 7 8,167 05/29/2013, 09:24 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Number theoretic formula for hyper operators (-oo, 2] at prime numbers JmsNxn 2 4,199 07/17/2012, 02:12 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)