• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 regular iteration of sqrt(2)^x (was: eta as branchpoint of tetrational) JmsNxn Long Time Fellow Posts: 291 Threads: 67 Joined: Dec 2010 06/09/2011, 06:20 PM @ Sheldon's root 2 postings: Hmm, this is all very interesting. I myself am interested in $\text{sexp}_{\sqrt{2}}(z)$; since I think this may be the natural base semi-operators work in. Therefore I have a few questions: I understand $\text{Lsexp}_{\sqrt{2}}(\text{Lsexp}_{\sqrt{2}}^{-1}(z) + \sigma) = \exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ \sigma}(z)\,\,;\,\,\R(z) < 2$ and $\text{Usexp}_{\sqrt{2}}(\text{Usexp}_{\sqrt{2}}^{-1}(z) + \sigma) = \exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ \sigma}(z)\,\,;\,\,\R(z) > 4$ Therefore how do we generate $\exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ \sigma}(z)\,\,;\,\,\R(z) \in (2, 4)$? Do we create a middle super function? Secondly, why doesn't $\text{Usexp}_{\sqrt{2}}(0) = 8$? Is there a reason it isn't like this? because if it was centered at 8 it would give the beautiful result: $\text{Usexp}_{\sqrt{2}}(\sigma) = 4\,\,\bigtriangleup_{\sigma}^{\small{\sqrt{2}}}\,\,4\,\,:\,\,\R(\sigma) \le 2$ It would also be consistent with the cheta function, where it's centered at 2 times the fix point. bo198214 Administrator Posts: 1,386 Threads: 90 Joined: Aug 2007 06/09/2011, 07:16 PM (This post was last modified: 06/09/2011, 07:16 PM by bo198214.) (06/09/2011, 06:20 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: Hmm, this is all very interesting. I myself am interested in $\text{sexp}_{\sqrt{2}}(z)$; since I think this may be the natural base semi-operators work in. Therefore I have a few questions: Here is some introduction into the topic. sheldonison Long Time Fellow Posts: 623 Threads: 22 Joined: Oct 2008 06/09/2011, 07:49 PM (This post was last modified: 06/09/2011, 09:17 PM by sheldonison.) (06/09/2011, 06:20 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: @ Sheldon's root 2 postings: Hmm, this is all very interesting. I myself am interested in $\text{sexp}_{\sqrt{2}}(z)$; since I think this may be the natural base semi-operators work in. Therefore I have a few questions: .... Therefore how do we generate $\exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ \sigma}(z)\,\,;\,\,\R(z) \in (2, 4)$? Do we create a middle super function?Hey James, $\exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ \sigma}(z)=\text{Usexp_{\sqrt{2}}(\text{Uslog_{\sqrt{2}}(z)+\sigma)$ The short answer, is that these functions are imaginary periodic. Usexp(z) has a period of approximately 19.236i. USexp is real valued at the real axis going from 4+delta to infinity. But at exactly half that period, the Usexp(z) function is also real valued from -infinity to infinity, gently making a transition from 4-delta to 2+delta. Lsexp(z) has a period of about 17.143i. And at exactly half that period, the Lsexp(z) function is real valued from -infinity to infinity, also gently making a transition from 4-delta to 2+delta. In going from 4-delta to 2+delta, these two functions can be lined up, so that they are nearly identical, but they differ by a tiny amount! So, for $z \in (2, 4)\,\; \Im(\text{Uslog_{\sqrt{2}}(z))\approx9.62i$. Hope that helps. - Sheldon Here are some more links (to go on wiki page?) http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...96#pid3296 And another really good thread. http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...534#pid534 JmsNxn Long Time Fellow Posts: 291 Threads: 67 Joined: Dec 2010 06/09/2011, 11:04 PM Thanks sheldon that was really helpful. Is there any code yet generating these two functions? And my second question still stands, though; why exactly does $\text{Usexp}_{\sqrt{2}}(0) = 5.767053...$, is this point arbitrary? If it was shifted to 8 it wouldn't affect its status as a super function of root 2 would it? It's just a horizontal shift right? sheldonison Long Time Fellow Posts: 623 Threads: 22 Joined: Oct 2008 06/09/2011, 11:45 PM (This post was last modified: 06/09/2011, 11:52 PM by sheldonison.) (06/09/2011, 11:04 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: Thanks sheldon that was really helpful. Is there any code yet generating these two functions? And my second question still stands, though; why exactly does $\text{Usexp}_{\sqrt{2}}(0) = 5.767053...$, is this point arbitrary? If it was shifted to 8 it wouldn't affect its status as a super function of root 2 would it? It's just a horizontal shift right? Horizontal shift -- yes and no. It is what comes out of the limit equation, that generates Usexp(0), limit as n->infinity. I'll need to dig that equation out. But even if you do a horizontal shift, it gets cancelled out since Uslog is the inverse of Usexp. I do have the lower level primitives, "superf(z)" and a "isuperf(z)" functions in kneser.gp. Type init(sqrt(2)), and those two functions are available. For bases

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Inspired by the sqrt tommy1729 0 1,188 02/13/2017, 01:11 AM Last Post: tommy1729 tetration base sqrt(e) tommy1729 2 2,930 02/14/2015, 12:36 AM Last Post: tommy1729 Regular iteration using matrix-Jordan-form Gottfried 7 7,538 09/29/2014, 11:39 PM Last Post: Gottfried [2014] sqrt boundary tommy1729 0 1,572 06/19/2014, 08:03 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Crazy conjecture connecting the sqrt(e) and tetrations! rsgerard 7 11,389 03/27/2014, 11:20 PM Last Post: tommy1729 regular tetration base sqrt(2) : an interesting(?) constant 2.76432104 Gottfried 7 7,993 06/25/2013, 01:37 PM Last Post: sheldonison Iteration series: Different fixpoints and iteration series (of an example polynomial) Gottfried 0 2,603 09/04/2011, 05:59 AM Last Post: Gottfried Base 'Enigma' iterative exponential, tetrational and pentational Cherrina_Pixie 4 8,977 07/02/2011, 07:13 AM Last Post: bo198214 eta as branchpoint of tetrational mike3 33 28,130 06/14/2011, 03:19 PM Last Post: sheldonison Fractional iteration of x^2+1 at infinity and fractional iteration of exp bo198214 10 15,126 06/09/2011, 05:56 AM Last Post: bo198214

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)