Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators
#4
Yes. By definition. and therefore the rest of the product disappears at natural values. That's the whole trick Tongue. I'd take the limit as just for technicality sake.





It's real for real and complex for complex and natural for natural . Very nice.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 07/19/2012, 10:26 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 2 136 09/09/2019, 10:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 1,556 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Where is the proof of a generalized integral for integer heights? Chenjesu 2 626 03/03/2019, 08:55 AM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Hyper-volume by integration Xorter 0 1,219 04/08/2017, 01:52 PM
Last Post: Xorter
  Hyper operators in computability theory JmsNxn 5 3,433 02/15/2017, 10:07 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Recursive formula generating bounded hyper-operators JmsNxn 0 1,328 01/17/2017, 05:10 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Rational operators (a {t} b); a,b > e solved JmsNxn 30 35,326 09/02/2016, 02:11 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  The bounded analytic semiHyper-operators JmsNxn 2 3,262 05/27/2016, 04:03 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  on constructing hyper operations for bases > eta JmsNxn 1 2,438 04/08/2015, 09:18 PM
Last Post: marraco
  Bounded Analytic Hyper operators JmsNxn 25 17,974 04/01/2015, 06:09 PM
Last Post: MphLee



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)