Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators
#11
that proof of convergeance seems valid.

( and used 1/n^2 as i expected )

congrats !

im not sure if we have differentiability though ...

if we do im betting on uniqueness.

i think we will get closer to an answer of uniqueness if we find a good solution. ( differentiable or not )

regards

tommy1729

ps : off topic , but im sick Sad

Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by tommy1729 - 08/06/2012, 03:32 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 2 156 09/09/2019, 10:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 1,607 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Where is the proof of a generalized integral for integer heights? Chenjesu 2 636 03/03/2019, 08:55 AM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Hyper-volume by integration Xorter 0 1,224 04/08/2017, 01:52 PM
Last Post: Xorter
  Hyper operators in computability theory JmsNxn 5 3,463 02/15/2017, 10:07 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Recursive formula generating bounded hyper-operators JmsNxn 0 1,335 01/17/2017, 05:10 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Rational operators (a {t} b); a,b > e solved JmsNxn 30 35,418 09/02/2016, 02:11 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  The bounded analytic semiHyper-operators JmsNxn 2 3,273 05/27/2016, 04:03 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  on constructing hyper operations for bases > eta JmsNxn 1 2,446 04/08/2015, 09:18 PM
Last Post: marraco
  Bounded Analytic Hyper operators JmsNxn 25 18,049 04/01/2015, 06:09 PM
Last Post: MphLee



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)