Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators
#12
Let's start by restricting ourselves to the following set:



We find that these numbers can be sequenced by such that

Our required theorem is the following:



I'll rephrase this algebraically as:



is non-commutative and non-associative







I'm keeping this as a foot note. It may be beneficial to consider operators as such. It seems far less gargantuan and much more as an algebraic equation.

Another formula I'm thinking I'll have to make use of is:







It's sort of like a quick fundamental theorem of arithmetic. I think it encodes more data then it's letting on.

Although this seems a bit trivial now. But with the inverse operator function; the inverse of:



Or at least a discrete point set of when returns a natural number we may be able to have some conversations with number theory. I feel like if this isn't the right answer for semi operators; it's a big leap in the right direction--the analytic direction. I like to think of it aesthetically as every complex operator is a unique factorization of the natural operators. Hopefully this can be sustained with the recursive law and maybe an identity function.

I'm hoping to sort of web together the recursion at all the points that are natural; showing from the mere fact of their existence (which requires the two requirements before) rather than computing them. I think it's pretty clear that computing this function to any degree of accuracy would need a quantum computer. Lol.

I'm sorry to hear that you're sick. Hope you get well.


YES!!!!

I have a taylor series! I have recursion written out as a requirement using typical analytic expressions! It's all down to a recursive pattern in I'm very close to obtaining a solution. I have a feeling uniqueness will be the difficult task. From here on however. I don't want to post too much until I have it all organized. I'm going to start writing up a short fifteen page or so paper on these. I'll be sure to give everyone at this forum credit. I've been posting stuff about this for a year and you guys have helped me into the environment tremendously--even just by forcing myself to keep up with you guys ^_^. When I have a rough draft I'll post another thread. I may ask a few questions here and there as well.


I'm very confident this is going to be fruitful in some way.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators - by JmsNxn - 08/08/2012, 11:23 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 2 142 09/09/2019, 10:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 1,560 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Where is the proof of a generalized integral for integer heights? Chenjesu 2 628 03/03/2019, 08:55 AM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Hyper-volume by integration Xorter 0 1,219 04/08/2017, 01:52 PM
Last Post: Xorter
  Hyper operators in computability theory JmsNxn 5 3,439 02/15/2017, 10:07 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Recursive formula generating bounded hyper-operators JmsNxn 0 1,328 01/17/2017, 05:10 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Rational operators (a {t} b); a,b > e solved JmsNxn 30 35,343 09/02/2016, 02:11 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  The bounded analytic semiHyper-operators JmsNxn 2 3,265 05/27/2016, 04:03 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  on constructing hyper operations for bases > eta JmsNxn 1 2,439 04/08/2015, 09:18 PM
Last Post: marraco
  Bounded Analytic Hyper operators JmsNxn 25 17,988 04/01/2015, 06:09 PM
Last Post: MphLee



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)