Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Generalized arithmetic operator
#6
Yes I noticed that it wasn't exactly lower hyper operators, but it's closer to it than anything else.

It depends on a lot of factors but the summation formula I gave may or may not work.

I think the recursion is more aptly written by the general law:



So it's almost like it's necessarily satisfying the exponential law. Which is really cool now that I think about it.

Let's see. I'm thinking there's trouble evaluating for arbitrary natural n and arbitrary natural k and complex a. So let's be a bit more modest with our findings. So let us fix a to N for some natural N

is definitely calculatable for m, k natural as well.


Now let us suppose that is holo in s for m greater than or equal to exponentiation
Define:



Where




Now do the same trick (hope fully you get what I mean so that I don't have to reexplain) so that we get:



And do the same trick one more time to get, , and :



This may or may not work depending on if the functions you defined are holo morphic. Mine are.

They should obey the recursion by some fractional calculus theorems I've given, it's a little clunky. but Not very hard to show. They may not equal your operators though, you'll have to do the calculations :p


I don't really want to spend the time to rigourously justify this. It's very time consuming and it requires a lot of finesse to pull off. But I can see the cauchy integrals coming out as they should after about 3 pages of equations for one identity. lol
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Generalized arithmetic operator - by hixidom - 03/11/2014, 03:52 AM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by JmsNxn - 03/11/2014, 03:15 PM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by hixidom - 03/11/2014, 06:24 PM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by MphLee - 03/11/2014, 10:49 PM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by hixidom - 03/11/2014, 11:20 PM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by MphLee - 03/12/2014, 11:18 AM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by JmsNxn - 03/12/2014, 02:59 AM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by hixidom - 03/12/2014, 04:37 AM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by MphLee - 03/12/2014, 06:19 PM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by hixidom - 03/12/2014, 06:43 PM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by hixidom - 03/22/2014, 12:06 AM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by hixidom - 03/22/2014, 12:42 AM
RE: Generalized arithmetic operator - by hixidom - 06/11/2014, 05:10 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition JmsNxn 4 6,455 06/23/2019, 08:19 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Tetration and Sign operator tetration101 0 302 05/15/2019, 07:55 PM
Last Post: tetration101
  Where is the proof of a generalized integral for integer heights? Chenjesu 2 736 03/03/2019, 08:55 AM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators JmsNxn 15 15,651 08/22/2016, 12:19 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  [rule 30] Is it possible to easily rewrite rule 30 in terms of modular arithmetic ? tommy1729 0 1,501 07/24/2014, 11:09 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Tetration and modular arithmetic. tommy1729 0 1,864 01/12/2014, 05:07 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Hyper operator space JmsNxn 0 1,819 08/12/2013, 10:17 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Generalized Bieberbach conjectures ? tommy1729 0 1,628 08/12/2013, 08:11 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Operator definition discrepancy? cacolijn 2 3,692 01/07/2013, 09:13 AM
Last Post: cacolijn
  Generalized Wiener Ikehara for exp[1/2](n) instead of n ? tommy1729 0 1,646 12/17/2012, 05:01 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)