Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ?
#1
Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ?

Is that a uniqueness condition ?

The difference between univalent and pseudounivalent is :

speudounivalent is weaker : f(z+k) = f(z) only possible if k is real.

regards

tommy1729
#2
I have to add : psuedounivalent must be a uniqueness criterion but without existance proven.

This follows from the earlier proven fact that sexp(z) analytic for Re(z)>0 is already a uniqueness criterion.

Hence the question becomes : is this analytic function sexp(z) pseudounivalent ?

We know that sexp(z) has singularies. In the thread " the fermat superfunction " I noticed that most entire functions are not pseudounivalent. The follows from the nonbijective nature of most entire functions and the many amount of fixpoints/zero's of most entire functions.

This motivated me to wonder about functions that are not entire hence returning to sexp(z).

Naturally I also wonder about other superfunctions ofcourse.

I do not recall the exact location of all previous posts regarding these issues but on MSE mick made a related post.


The case which mick answer is actually about exp, but the same applies by analogue to sexp for Re(z)>0.

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/...-equations

Btw his score of -5 is rediculous.
This reminds me of the reasons why I am not or no longer on places such as MSE , sci.math, wiki etc.

Tetration forum rules Smile
But other tend not too imho.

regards

tommy1729
#3
Let a,b > 0. Let a',b' > 0.
Because exponential iterations of a + b i usually get arbitrarily close to any other a' + b' i , I am tempted to say that sexp(z) is NOT psuedounivalent.

So entire superfunctions are usually not pseudounivalent and since many iterations of analytic functions behave chaotic (like exp) , neither are most nonentire superfunctions.

So, what is an example of a nontrivial pseudounivalent superfunction ?

If they exist at all ?

Together with my friend mick im working on this.

Im pessimistic though.
And you ?

regards

tommy1729
#4
Related : http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...39#pid6839

SO probably no twice a superfunction.

regards

tommy1729


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Two types of tetration : sexp ' > or < 1. tommy1729 6 727 10/17/2023, 02:05 PM
Last Post: leon
Question When Does \(\displaystyle\int_{-1}^0\text{sexp}(x)\,\mathrm{d}x\) Equal \(\frac12\)? Catullus 0 710 10/31/2022, 11:47 PM
Last Post: Catullus
  Revitalizing an old idea : estimated fake sexp'(x) = F3(x) tommy1729 0 1,041 02/27/2022, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 4,276 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can sexp(z) be periodic ?? tommy1729 2 9,300 01/14/2015, 01:19 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  pseudo2periodic sexp. tommy1729 0 4,092 06/27/2014, 10:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? tommy1729 1 6,670 06/17/2014, 01:25 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Multiple exp^[1/2](z) by same sexp ? tommy1729 12 32,663 05/06/2014, 10:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  entire function close to sexp ?? tommy1729 8 21,909 04/30/2014, 03:49 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Vincent's theorem and sin(sexp) ? tommy1729 0 3,914 03/22/2014, 11:46 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)