• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ? tommy1729 Ultimate Fellow Posts: 1,365 Threads: 333 Joined: Feb 2009 03/25/2014, 12:46 AM (This post was last modified: 03/25/2014, 01:01 PM by tommy1729.) Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ? Is that a uniqueness condition ? The difference between univalent and pseudounivalent is : speudounivalent is weaker : f(z+k) = f(z) only possible if k is real. regards tommy1729 tommy1729 Ultimate Fellow Posts: 1,365 Threads: 333 Joined: Feb 2009 03/25/2014, 01:19 PM (This post was last modified: 03/25/2014, 01:20 PM by tommy1729.) I have to add : psuedounivalent must be a uniqueness criterion but without existance proven. This follows from the earlier proven fact that sexp(z) analytic for Re(z)>0 is already a uniqueness criterion. Hence the question becomes : is this analytic function sexp(z) pseudounivalent ? We know that sexp(z) has singularies. In the thread " the fermat superfunction " I noticed that most entire functions are not pseudounivalent. The follows from the nonbijective nature of most entire functions and the many amount of fixpoints/zero's of most entire functions. This motivated me to wonder about functions that are not entire hence returning to sexp(z). Naturally I also wonder about other superfunctions ofcourse. I do not recall the exact location of all previous posts regarding these issues but on MSE mick made a related post. The case which mick answer is actually about exp, but the same applies by analogue to sexp for Re(z)>0. http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/...-equations Btw his score of -5 is rediculous. This reminds me of the reasons why I am not or no longer on places such as MSE , sci.math, wiki etc. Tetration forum rules But other tend not too imho. regards tommy1729 tommy1729 Ultimate Fellow Posts: 1,365 Threads: 333 Joined: Feb 2009 03/26/2014, 12:30 AM Let a,b > 0. Let a',b' > 0. Because exponential iterations of a + b i usually get arbitrarily close to any other a' + b' i , I am tempted to say that sexp(z) is NOT psuedounivalent. So entire superfunctions are usually not pseudounivalent and since many iterations of analytic functions behave chaotic (like exp) , neither are most nonentire superfunctions. So, what is an example of a nontrivial pseudounivalent superfunction ? If they exist at all ? Together with my friend mick im working on this. Im pessimistic though. And you ? regards tommy1729 tommy1729 Ultimate Fellow Posts: 1,365 Threads: 333 Joined: Feb 2009 03/26/2014, 01:24 PM Related : http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...39#pid6839 SO probably no twice a superfunction. regards tommy1729 « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 1,636 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Can sexp(z) be periodic ?? tommy1729 2 3,919 01/14/2015, 01:19 PM Last Post: tommy1729 pseudo2periodic sexp. tommy1729 0 1,859 06/27/2014, 10:45 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? tommy1729 1 2,897 06/17/2014, 01:25 PM Last Post: sheldonison Multiple exp^[1/2](z) by same sexp ? tommy1729 12 14,059 05/06/2014, 10:55 PM Last Post: tommy1729 entire function close to sexp ?? tommy1729 8 9,689 04/30/2014, 03:49 PM Last Post: JmsNxn Vincent's theorem and sin(sexp) ? tommy1729 0 1,767 03/22/2014, 11:46 PM Last Post: tommy1729 sexp for base (1/e)^e ~= 0.0660? sheldonison 10 11,217 11/22/2013, 11:20 PM Last Post: mike3 tetration base conversion, and sexp/slog limit equations sheldonison 44 56,162 02/27/2013, 07:05 PM Last Post: sheldonison sexp by continuum product ? tommy1729 6 8,807 06/30/2011, 10:07 PM Last Post: tommy1729

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)