Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
introducing TPID 16
#3
(06/08/2014, 04:05 PM)sheldonison Wrote: One other problem is that the "otherwise" statement here is identical to the then statement.

No. Larger or equal than 0 =/= larger than 0.
( for x)

You are mistaken.
Even if I shake ideas out of my sleeve I usually know what Im doing.

I was aware of Jay's observation.

regards

tommy1729
Reply


Messages In This Thread
introducing TPID 16 - by tommy1729 - 06/07/2014, 11:03 PM
RE: introducing TPID 16 - by sheldonison - 06/08/2014, 04:05 PM
RE: introducing TPID 16 - by tommy1729 - 06/09/2014, 09:55 AM
RE: introducing TPID 16 - by tommy1729 - 06/18/2014, 11:36 PM
RE: introducing TPID 16 - by tommy1729 - 06/18/2014, 11:46 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 1,806 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Flexible etas and eulers ? TPID 10 tommy1729 0 1,629 08/19/2016, 12:09 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  (almost) proof of TPID 13 fivexthethird 1 2,602 05/06/2016, 04:12 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Introducing new special function : Lambert_t(z,r) tommy1729 2 4,008 01/10/2016, 06:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  TPID 4 tommy1729 29 28,169 07/07/2014, 11:56 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  TPID 8 tommy1729 0 2,066 04/04/2011, 10:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Discussion of TPID 6 JJacquelin 3 6,658 10/24/2010, 07:44 AM
Last Post: bo198214
  Another proof of TPID 6 tommy1729 0 2,282 07/25/2010, 11:51 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  proof: Limit of self-super-roots is e^1/e. TPID 6 bo198214 3 7,629 07/10/2010, 09:13 AM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)