Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Zeration = inconsistant ?
#14
(10/01/2014, 08:40 AM)tommy1729 Wrote: ........
To understand tetration you need to understand +,*,^ at least.
To understand ^ you need to understand *.
To understand * you need to understand +.

Defining and understanding a hyperoperator seems to require the lower hyperoperators.
But with zeration that is A PROBLEM.
.....
..... properties like distributive require use of a lower hyperoperator : a * (b+c) = a*b + a*c.
....
Zeration seems to lack properties and therefore consistancy.
regards
tommy1729

As a matter of fact, if you apply these principles, you would indeed discover a problem with ... 'Addition', because:
"To understand + you (would) need to understand o!". In fact, we should have (sorry for 'o' and, please, forget 'some' useless brackets):

a * a = a ^ 2; a * (a * a) = a ^ 3
a + a = a * 2; a + (a + a) = a * 3
a o a = a + 2; a o (a o a) = a + 3.

And, moreover, as we have seen:
a + (b o c) = (a + b) o (a + c), i.e. the 'descending' distributivity seems to hold! And ... to gain consistency! Smile

And, don't forget: 2o2 = 2+2 = 2*2 = 2^2 = 2#2 = .... 2[s]2 = 4. The 'Magic Four' relation!

Thank you for your interest. Best regards.
GFR

Reply


Messages In This Thread
Zeration = inconsistant ? - by tommy1729 - 10/01/2014, 08:40 AM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by MphLee - 10/01/2014, 11:27 AM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by GFR - 10/02/2014, 02:44 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by tommy1729 - 10/02/2014, 09:27 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by MphLee - 10/02/2014, 10:02 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by GFR - 10/04/2014, 09:58 AM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by tommy1729 - 10/02/2014, 10:58 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by GFR - 10/03/2014, 11:29 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by tommy1729 - 10/04/2014, 12:11 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by tommy1729 - 10/02/2014, 11:11 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by GFR - 10/03/2014, 11:39 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by tommy1729 - 10/04/2014, 12:12 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by MphLee - 10/03/2014, 09:20 AM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by tommy1729 - 10/03/2014, 09:32 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by tommy1729 - 10/03/2014, 09:41 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by GFR - 10/04/2014, 10:19 AM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by MphLee - 10/04/2014, 11:24 AM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by tommy1729 - 10/04/2014, 12:16 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by MphLee - 10/04/2014, 12:58 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by tommy1729 - 10/04/2014, 10:20 PM
RE: Zeration = inconsistant ? - by MphLee - 10/05/2014, 03:36 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Zeration GFR 80 100,394 10/31/2016, 02:57 PM
Last Post: Stanislav
  Zeration reconsidered using plusation. tommy1729 1 2,854 10/23/2015, 03:39 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Is this close to zeration ? tommy1729 0 1,937 03/30/2015, 11:34 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2015] 4th Zeration from base change pentation tommy1729 5 5,580 03/29/2015, 05:47 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2015] New zeration and matrix log ? tommy1729 1 3,050 03/24/2015, 07:07 AM
Last Post: marraco
  [2014] Inconsistant equation ? tommy1729 0 1,732 07/27/2014, 02:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  base change inconsistant ? tommy1729 2 3,046 11/26/2012, 08:13 AM
Last Post: Nasser



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)