Infinite tetration giving I*Omega costant=I*0.567143...  Printable Version + Tetration Forum (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum) + Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) + Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) + Thread: Infinite tetration giving I*Omega costant=I*0.567143... (/showthread.php?tid=127) Pages:
1
2

RE: Infinite tetration giving I*Omega costant=I*0.567143...  Ivars  03/07/2008 bo198214 Wrote:Ivars Wrote: Thanks. is nth iteration of , starting with , when n=0 . It is the same as in iteration formula (map) , while is next iteration result =angle n+1, I just did not know how to add indexes in tex. This limit is called rotation or winding number. In my simulation, when n=1829, =1825.78027070570366694723301.... so /1829=0.998239623130510479468142710945 RE: Infinite tetration giving I*Omega costant=I*0.567143...  bo198214  03/09/2008 Ivars Wrote:Thanks. is nth iteration of , starting with , when n=0 . Ok that means where and . I put some effort into investigating this sequence . For the case of and that you describe one can see numerically that in the limit for some constant . By this observation we put up: (1) If converges we can choose so that converges to 0. In this case the equation has to be satisfied in the limit too: So that if then , , where has to be satisfied. Let then all possible solutions are and for integer . However only one of them is the actual value in . For example in our case and . If vice versa is given as above, what conditions are to be satisfied that ? We put into equation (1), first: , for simplicity let , where we get for solutions and for solutions . now into (1) The interesting cases is (a) if and and (b) if and together with c) . We assume in the following that and only consider the case . If then and only positive values are subtracted from , so satisfies case (a). If then and the condition is equivalent to . In this case and as both side are positive we can quadrate getting equivalently: , let so case (b) is occurs exactly for So in the case it is this satisified for all otherwise for . As a last step we give conditions for c) . Let and . In the case that we have to assure that the subtractions of and do not lead below , i.e. at most . In the case , and we showed already that , so that the subtraction of and the addition of increases . We shall ascertain that . The condition is easy to check: Now we know that for , hence the condition is satisfied if we demand: . The condition , let and : . Similarly to the previous case the condition is satisfied for: . We know that is striclty increasing for and (graph it!). Hence there is an such that (which is equivalent to ) for all . Now going backwards we get Proposition. Let , , , , and let be the solution of . If there exists an and integer such that , then , particularly . Verify the conditions for your choice: , , , , . The last condition that , or even the stronger condition that is quite probable for any sufficient chaotic choice of and . So for your choice but also many other choices for and indeed . PS: By the length of the derivations I can not exclude that somewhere got an error into the computations, so dont take the result as granted. RE: Infinite tetration giving I*Omega costant=I*0.567143...  Ivars  03/09/2008 bo198214 Wrote:Ok that means where and . Thanks, It will .... take me some time to digest. I do not quite understand the first assumption, Quote: one can see numerically that in the limit for some constant . As far as I did it (1850 terms), nothing is constantYou mean you replaced small difference of sin from 1 with an argument? But as sin argument nears n*(3pi/2), can You do it? As I see it since teta(n+1)teta(n) = 1 when n> infinity, there shall be no differences between teta(n) and n integer part. There can not be one also in reals, since limit n>infinity is 1. So this constant seems suspicious to meor may be I misunderstood something. Ivars RE: Infinite tetration giving I*Omega costant=I*0.567143...  bo198214  03/09/2008 Ivars Wrote:Quote: one can see numerically that in the limit for some constant . Whats not clear about this? Just compute with . You see numerically that and that means that in the limit. 