2 real fixpoints ... 3 iterations ? - Printable Version +- Tetration Forum ( https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum)+-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics ( https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)+--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion ( https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)+--- Thread: 2 real fixpoints ... 3 iterations ? ( /showthread.php?tid=320) |

2 real fixpoints ... 3 iterations ? - tommy1729 - 08/08/2009
ok , first i dont know if this has been asked or answered before , so forgive my ignorance if such is the case. consider an analytic function f(z) , strictly rising on the reals with 2 real fixpoints. now we can use regular iteration for each fixpoint and thus get two ' zones ' that are ' correct ' half-iterates. ( assuming radius = oo too ) sketch : [ - oo .. zone 1 .. fixpoint 1 .. zone 2 .. fixpoint 2 .. zone 3 .. + oo ] when expanded at fixpoint 1 and missing the fixpoint 2 ( and radius oo ) i consider that regular half-iterate as a correct solution to 'zone 1' similarly : when expanded at fixpoint 2 and missing the fixpoint 1 ( and radius oo ) i consider that regular half-iterate as a correct solution to 'zone 3' So the question becomes , what gives zone 2 ? Regards Tommy1729 RE: 2 real fixpoints ... 3 iterations ? - bo198214 - 08/09/2009
(08/08/2009, 11:31 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: now we can use regular iteration for each fixpoint and thus get two ' zones ' that are ' correct ' half-iterates. ( assuming radius = oo too ) regular iteration at fp 1 is valid at zone 1&2 and regular iteration at fp 2 is valid at zone 2&3. RE: 2 real fixpoints ... 3 iterations ? - tommy1729 - 08/10/2009
(08/09/2009, 12:27 AM)bo198214 Wrote:(08/08/2009, 11:31 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: now we can use regular iteration for each fixpoint and thus get two ' zones ' that are ' correct ' half-iterates. ( assuming radius = oo too ) no , you assume regular iteration at fp1 touches fp 2 , what if it doesnt ? RE: 2 real fixpoints ... 3 iterations ? - jaydfox - 08/10/2009
(08/10/2009, 11:03 PM)tommy1729 Wrote:But wouldn't that necessitate another fixed point between fp1 and fp2? Why else would regular iteration from fp1 not reach fp2? By your original stipulation, the function is strictly increasing (except, of course, at the fixed points). If it does not get from fp1 to fp2, there must be some point (which we can find by taking the limit of infinite iterations) which is a fixed point.(08/09/2009, 12:27 AM)bo198214 Wrote: regular iteration at fp 1 is valid at zone 1&2 and regular iteration at fp 2 is valid at zone 2&3. RE: 2 real fixpoints ... 3 iterations ? - bo198214 - 08/10/2009
(08/10/2009, 11:20 PM)jaydfox Wrote:(08/10/2009, 11:03 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: no , you assume regular iteration at fp1 touches fp 2 , what if it doesnt ?But wouldn't that necessitate another fixed point between fp1 and fp2? Why else would regular iteration from fp1 not reach fp2? By your original stipulation, the function is strictly increasing (except, of course, at the fixed points). If it does not get from fp1 to fp2, there must be some point (which we can find by taking the limit of infinite iterations) which is a fixed point. Exactly. |