Tetration Forum
Modular arithmetic - Printable Version

+- Tetration Forum (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum)
+-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: Modular arithmetic (/showthread.php?tid=435)



Modular arithmetic - Stereotomy - 04/02/2010

I'll just preface this by saying I'm just a physics undergrad, so this might be a bit beyond my understanding, and I may well be missing something obvious or making a stupid mistake, but while playing around I noticed that it seems to be true that





Is this actually true? And if so is there a proof of it I'll be able to wrap my mind around?


RE: Modular arithmetic - bo198214 - 04/02/2010

(04/02/2010, 07:16 PM)Stereotomy Wrote:



Is this actually true? And if so is there a proof of it I'll be able to wrap my mind around?

I dont think it is true. For example:



RE: Modular arithmetic - Stereotomy - 04/03/2010

(04/02/2010, 10:57 PM)bo198214 Wrote:
(04/02/2010, 07:16 PM)Stereotomy Wrote:



Is this actually true? And if so is there a proof of it I'll be able to wrap my mind around?

I dont think it is true. For example:

Ah, good point, though

Is true as well. In fact, thinking about it, the numbers I tried out with this all had b>a. Perhaps that's an additional condition that either b > a or m, n > 1?

Just quickly tried this for a few low examples, a = 8, 9, 10, 11, and it seems to hold.


RE: Modular arithmetic - bo198214 - 04/03/2010

(04/03/2010, 12:18 AM)Stereotomy Wrote:
Is true as well. In fact, thinking about it, the numbers I tried out with this all had b>a. Perhaps that's an additional condition that either b > a or m, n > 1?

There is an article which proves that (which is in Knuth's arrow notation) finally will be constant for mod any , see this thread.