![]() |
One very important formula - Printable Version +- Tetration Forum (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum) +-- Forum: Tetration and Related Topics (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Mathematical and General Discussion (https://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: One very important formula (/showthread.php?tid=528) |
One very important formula - Ansus - 11/03/2010 Anybody shell know this very important formula: where http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A111672 http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A144150 http://www.research.att.com/~njas/sequences/A153277 This formula can be easily derived from regular teration, but has a long history dating from 1945 ( J. Ginsburg, Iterated exponentials, Scripta Math. 11 (1945), 340-353.) It is notable that tetration and Bell's polynomials of n-th order have applications in quantum physics: http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.4047 RE: One very important formula - mike3 - 11/03/2010 So does this give real-valued answers for real RE: One very important formula - Ansus - 11/03/2010 Corrected the usage of r. RE: One very important formula - bo198214 - 11/03/2010 (11/03/2010, 12:21 AM)Ansus Wrote: where You mean "Bell number"? The Bell polynomials are multivariate polynomials ... Otherwise I second the questions of Mike and add the question about convergence. RE: One very important formula - Ansus - 11/03/2010 (11/03/2010, 01:03 AM)bo198214 Wrote: You mean "Bell number"? Yes. RE: One very important formula - Daniel - 11/03/2010 You might be interested in my paper Bell Polynomials of Iterated Functions. RE: One very important formula - mike3 - 11/03/2010 (11/03/2010, 02:27 AM)Ansus Wrote:(11/03/2010, 01:03 AM)bo198214 Wrote: You mean "Bell number"? So how do you extend it to real values of x, and is this solution real valued for bases RE: One very important formula - Ansus - 11/03/2010 (11/03/2010, 03:16 AM)mike3 Wrote: So how do you extend it to real values of x, and is this solution real valued for bases It is derived from regular iteration, so it diverges for higher bases, but my aim was to find an expression for tetration that does not refer to taetration itself, thus allowing to derive its properties. David Knuth referred to the following operation calling it 'binomial convolution': If we use such operator, we can write: And Thus the result of the convolution is a polynomial of x and k of degree n-1 and we can take indefinite sum of it symbolically. Note also that binomial convolution corresponds to the product of exponential generating functions. This means product of tetrations corresponds to binomial convolution of Bell's numbers of higher orders. |